Daily Life Dialogue Assessment in Psychiatric Care—Face Validity and Inter-Rater Reliability of a Tool Based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health

Johansson, Catrin; Åström, Sture; Kauffeldt, Anders; Carlström, Eric

doi:10.1016/j.apnu.2013.08.005

Cited by 8 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It represented a new way of working, focusing on patients' functions and patient participation. Development of the DLDA began back in 2007 when a psychiatric clinic in Sweden and University West began a collaboration to implement the ICF in clinical practice [4] . However, it was necessary to develop some kind of short version that included the most important ICF items in relation to the psychiatric nursing context.…”

Section: Contextmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The project consisted of the implementation of a new assessment tool, the DLDA [4] . The assessment tool was based on the ICF's component of Activities and Participation [5,6] .…”

Section: Contextmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This is a descriptive study based on qualitative data, collected through focus group interviews [43,44] conducted pre-and post-implementation of the DLDA tool [4] . To investigate the process of implementing the DLDA and to learn more about outcomes from a nursing perspective, seven focus group interviews were conducted with a total of 19 psychiatric nursing staff.…”

Section: Focus Group Interviewsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, it was necessary to develop some kind of short version that included the most important ICF items in relation to the psychiatric nursing context. Because none of the already existing short versions, such as core sets, checklists or disability assessment schedules [39][40][41] , were appropriate for the current clinical practice, a non-validated ICF-based assessment tool was developed [4] .…”

Section: Contextmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The focus groups provided a general picture of the participating inpatient as well as outpatient wards, including the perspectives of different professionals prior to implementation. The key participants' role was to take part in a training programme that would allow them to implement a new working method [4,[31][32][33] . The training programme consisted of training in the ICF and the DLDA tool.…”

Section: Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

The process of implementing a new working method - a project towards change in a Swedish psychiatric clinic

Alverbratt

Carlström

Åström

et al. 2014

JHA

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The implementation of evidence-based methods in hospital settings is difficult and complex. The aim of the present study was to highlight the implementation process concerning a new working method, i.e. a new assessment tool, based on the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF), among psychiatric nursing staff on five participating wards at a Swedish county hospital. Descriptive, qualitative data were collected through focus group interviews pre-and post-implementation. Data were analysed using directed content analysis, guided by Normalization Process Theory (NPT). The results revealed that just one of the five participating wards met the criteria for a successful implementation process. The results confirm previous studies showing the difficulty of implementation. Although participants agreed with the intention of the model, they were reluctant to apply it in practice. The implementation process seemed to be influenced by factors such as: time pressure; heavy workload; stress; lack of routines in using the tool; lack of nursing staff; as well as cultural characteristics and resistance to change.

show abstract

Section: Contextmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The project consisted of the implementation of a new assessment tool, the DLDA [4] . The assessment tool was based on the ICF's component of Activities and Participation [5,6] .…”

Section: Contextmentioning

confidence: 99%