2006
DOI: 10.1891/jnm-v14i2a004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Daily Events and Mood State Among Individuals Living With HIV: Examination of the Within-Persons Approach to Data Collection Using Daily Diary Methodology

Abstract: Studies examining the link between stressful events and coping with HIV have relied on a between-persons approach focusing on how individuals differ on some characteristics. Although the between-subjects approach has yielded important information, our goal was to use a within-persons approach, making repeated measurements of the same persons over many days, to examine the impact of changing circumstances on the mood states of those with HIV. A second goal was to determine if asking participants to report their… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistical power was adequate to detect moderate effects based on over 2300 daily questionnaires completed by participants, but high between-participant variability in a small sample might have contributed to weaker than expected effects. The number of participants is comparable to the small N in some prior EMA studies of PLWH [ 27 ], although at least two larger-scale studies have been conducted on individual risk factors: alcohol [ 13 ] and mood [ 12 ]. Statistical models with multiple simultaneous predictors were not used in the current analysis because of the high risk of sample-dependent results and a potential lack of generalizability when data-driven decision rules are used with a small sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical power was adequate to detect moderate effects based on over 2300 daily questionnaires completed by participants, but high between-participant variability in a small sample might have contributed to weaker than expected effects. The number of participants is comparable to the small N in some prior EMA studies of PLWH [ 27 ], although at least two larger-scale studies have been conducted on individual risk factors: alcohol [ 13 ] and mood [ 12 ]. Statistical models with multiple simultaneous predictors were not used in the current analysis because of the high risk of sample-dependent results and a potential lack of generalizability when data-driven decision rules are used with a small sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…State- and trait-level measures of a construct are related, but only moderately correlated (Ptacek, Pierce, & Thompson, 2006), and they show different predictive relationships to behavior (Mustanski, 2007; Barta et al, 2008; Janda, Markowski, Derlega, Nezlek, & McCain, 2006). This difference likely occurs because as experience transitions into memory, people remember or re-interpret state-level events based on their conscious thoughts or beliefs (Schwartz, 2012).…”
Section: Discrepancies Between State-level and Trait-level Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of these potential consequences, many PLWH carefully manage information about their HIV and attempt to limit disclosure of their HIV serostatus; maintaining secrecy about HIV infection may then create additional sources of distress. In part because of these stressors, depression is common in HIV, and may exacerbate existing physical symptoms, result in treatment nonadherence, or be expressed as somatic complaints [9, 10]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%