2000
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9437(2000)126:1(8)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Daily Evapotranspiration Prediction from Louisiana Flooded Rice Field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
11
1
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
11
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…3). A number of studies evaluating ET in rice systems show increasing K c values as the crop progresses through flowering and then decreasing (Tomar and O'Toole 1980;Lourence and Pruitt 1971;Alberto et al 2011;Shah and Edling 2000)-a trend that is not immediately apparent in this study.…”
Section: Et C and K Ccontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…3). A number of studies evaluating ET in rice systems show increasing K c values as the crop progresses through flowering and then decreasing (Tomar and O'Toole 1980;Lourence and Pruitt 1971;Alberto et al 2011;Shah and Edling 2000)-a trend that is not immediately apparent in this study.…”
Section: Et C and K Ccontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…As suggested by many authors, the values of this parameter seem to be constant (1.1-1.2) during all phenological stages for different crops, except at the beginning of the vegetative period, when the crop is not completely covering the soil, and during the maturity stage when the leaves are drying up [12]. Crop coefficients based on the Penman-Monteith method were considered adequate for rice irrigation management purposes [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The main reason for flooding a rice field is that most rice varieties maintain better growth and produce higher grain yields when grown in a flooded soil than when grown in a nonflooded soil [5]. This type of irrigation does not help save water and may cause abundant water loss [27]. Rice water requirement ranges between 750 and 2500 mm, with an average value of 1250 mm [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there is a strong need for local calibration of crop coefficients because the climatic conditions in the field differ from the standard conditions. Shah and Edling (2000) evaluated PM, FAO-Penman and 1963 Penman combination models for their capabilities to predict rice ET using daily weather data. Crop coefficients of rice for the vegetative, flowering, and yield formation stages were found 1.39, 1.51, and 1.43, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%