The Asian citrus psyllid (ACP), Diaphorina citri Kuwayama, is one of the most serious citrus pests worldwide due to its role as vector of huanglongbing or citrus greening disease.While some optimal plant species for ACP oviposition and development have been identified, little is known of the influence of host plants on ACP size and shape. Our goal was to determine how size and shape of ACP wing and body size varies when development occurs on different host plants in a controlled rearing environment. ACP were reared on six different rutaceous species; Bergera koenigii, Citrus aurantifolia, Citrus macrophylla, Citrus maxima, Citrus taiwanica and Murraya paniculata. Adults were examined for morphometric variation using traditional and geometric analysis based on 12 traits or landmarks. ACP reared on C. taiwanica were consistently smaller than those reared on the other plant species. Wing aspect ratio also differed between C. maxima and C. taiwanica. Significant differences in shape were detected with those reared on M. paniculata having narrower wings than those reared on C. macrophylla. This study provides evidence of wing size and shape differences of ACP based on host plant species which potentially may impact dispersal. Further study is needed to determine if behavioral and physiological differences are associated with the observed phenotypic differences.
63Morphometric analysis provides a tool to evaluate phenotypic variation that results from 64 a range of biotic and abiotic factors (Daly, 1985). Traditional morphometric analysis of size and 65 size ratios has been the classical approach for quantifying variation in biological specimens. It is 66 used to determine instar, and to compare genetic, environmental and phenotypic variation (Daly, 67 1985). A newer approach, geometric morphometric analysis, provides a mechanism to evaluate 68 shape independent of size through the use of landmarks on two-and three-dimensional surfaces , 1990; Bookstein, 1991 Bookstein, , 1996 Rohlf & Marcus, 1993;Dryden & Mardia, 1998).70 Geometric morphometric analysis has provided insight into patterns of morphological variation 71 associated with Musca domestica L. wild populations and laboratory colonies (Ludoški et al.,72 2014), wild sandfly populations (Santos et al., 2015), the discrimination of four species of Culex 73 mosquitoes (Laurito et al., 2015) and synonymy of two Bactrocera species (Schutze et al., 2015).74 Geometric morphometric analysis has also been instrumental in visualizing and comparing