2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40119-016-0067-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dabigatran Versus Warfarin for Direct Current Cardioversion in Atrial Fibrillation

Abstract: IntroductionDirect current cardioversion (DCCV) is considered as the most effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). AF is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism, and DCCV may increase this risk. The current recommendation is, therefore, to anticoagulate for at least 3 weeks before DCCV and 4 weeks after the procedure.MethodsA retrospective study of patients referred for elective DCCV as treatment for AF in Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust was performed to compare the safety and ef… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Collectively, each of these studies found reductions in time to cardioversion ranging from 18 to 42 days when DOACs were used instead of warfarin. 27,[37][38][39][40] The improved efficiency with DOACs is clinically relevant because shorter duration in AF prior to ECV is a predictor of maintenance in sinus rhythm following cardioversion. 40,41 Pharmacoeconomic studies outside the United States have demonstrated sizable cost savings equivalent to approximately 250 to 500 US dollars per patient when DOACs are used in place of warfarin; the cost savings are largely attributable to reductions in cardioversion delays and laboratory monitoring.…”
Section: Additional Benefits and Limitations Of Doacs Pericardioversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Collectively, each of these studies found reductions in time to cardioversion ranging from 18 to 42 days when DOACs were used instead of warfarin. 27,[37][38][39][40] The improved efficiency with DOACs is clinically relevant because shorter duration in AF prior to ECV is a predictor of maintenance in sinus rhythm following cardioversion. 40,41 Pharmacoeconomic studies outside the United States have demonstrated sizable cost savings equivalent to approximately 250 to 500 US dollars per patient when DOACs are used in place of warfarin; the cost savings are largely attributable to reductions in cardioversion delays and laboratory monitoring.…”
Section: Additional Benefits and Limitations Of Doacs Pericardioversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27,[37][38][39][40] The improved efficiency with DOACs is clinically relevant because shorter duration in AF prior to ECV is a predictor of maintenance in sinus rhythm following cardioversion. 40,41 Pharmacoeconomic studies outside the United States have demonstrated sizable cost savings equivalent to approximately 250 to 500 US dollars per patient when DOACs are used in place of warfarin; the cost savings are largely attributable to reductions in cardioversion delays and laboratory monitoring. 42,43 Although the lack of need for routine laboratory monitoring may be convenient for patients, some providers may view the inability to verify medication adherence and therapeutic levels as a limitation.…”
Section: Additional Benefits and Limitations Of Doacs Pericardioversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The X‐VeRT trial reported even shorter times to delayed cardioversion with DOACs, which may be due to the fact that patients on warfarin do not always keep their INR between 2.0 and 3.0 for the 3 weeks prior to cardioversion . These findings are supported by a small study (n=106) that evaluated time to cardioversion for patients receiving dabigatran or warfarin . Mean time to cardioversion for patients on dabigatran was significantly shorter than for patients receiving warfarin (54 days vs 82 days; respectively, p=0.001).…”
Section: Management Of Patients Receiving Doacs Undergoing Cardioversionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…24 These findings are supported by a small study (n=106) that evaluated time to cardioversion for patients receiving dabigatran or warfarin. 33 Mean time to cardioversion for patients on dabigatran was significantly shorter than for patients receiving warfarin (54 days vs 82 days; respectively, p=0.001). A Danish registry including 1230 patients receiving dabigatran or warfarin also evaluated mean times to cardioversion.…”
Section: Time To Cardioversionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The traditional therapeutic approach to these patients is treatment with parenteral anticoagulants or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), mostly Warfarin [1,8,12]. The current ESC guidelines also suggest that the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) could be as efficient and safer as VKAs, however robust data from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are lacking [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%