2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2010.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dabigatran etexilate versus warfarin as the oral anticoagulant of choice? A review of clinical data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…10 While both activated partial thromboplastin and prothrombin times are prolonged, these measures are not sensitive in patients taking dabigatran. 11 Ecarin clotting time is more sensitive but not widely available in the clinical setting. 12 Dabigatran (Pradaxa) has no reversal agent and little evidence supporting procoagulant strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 While both activated partial thromboplastin and prothrombin times are prolonged, these measures are not sensitive in patients taking dabigatran. 11 Ecarin clotting time is more sensitive but not widely available in the clinical setting. 12 Dabigatran (Pradaxa) has no reversal agent and little evidence supporting procoagulant strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Le dabigatran inhibe la thrombine de manière spécifique et directe [2]. Le taux de liaison aux protéines plasmatiques du dabigatran est de 35 % [1].…”
Section: Dabigatran (Pradaxa ® )unclassified
“…Ein Antidot bei Überdosierung ist nicht verfügbar. Daten zur Wirksamkeit als orales TVT-Prophylaktikum bei hospitalisierten Patienten liegen derzeit nicht vor [34].…”
Section: Direkte Thrombininhibitorenunclassified