2011
DOI: 10.1021/jo201252q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DABCO as a Dynamic Hinge between Cofacial Porphyrin Panels and Its Tumbling inside a Supramolecular Cavity

Abstract: The heteroleptic supramolecular double-decker porphyrin 1 was synthesized with DABCO as a guest between two cofacial porphyrin units as characterized by (1)H NMR and ESI-MS. While DABCO is not seen to tumble inside the cavity, even at higher temperatures (80 °C), such motion was triggered upon addition of various coordinating ligands (quinuclidine, 4-bromopyridine, or excess of DABCO). Different stoichiometric amounts were needed depending on the n donor quality of the added ligands to initiate tumbling of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
32
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The binding constants K 1.1 determined for 2 ⋅ A and 5 ⋅ A are only slightly higher compared to previous reports in which the titrations were performed using a different solvent; that is, dichloromethane . In the case of 6 ⋅ A , the binding constant compares well with the one observed between 6 and a zinc(II)–porphyrin similar to A . In all four cases ( 2 ⋅ A , 3 ⋅ A , 5 ⋅ A and 6 ⋅ A ), Job‐Plot analysis indicated the formation of discrete 1:1 self‐assembly species between A and 2 , 3 , 5 and 6 , respectively (see the Supporting Information)…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 40%
“…The binding constants K 1.1 determined for 2 ⋅ A and 5 ⋅ A are only slightly higher compared to previous reports in which the titrations were performed using a different solvent; that is, dichloromethane . In the case of 6 ⋅ A , the binding constant compares well with the one observed between 6 and a zinc(II)–porphyrin similar to A . In all four cases ( 2 ⋅ A , 3 ⋅ A , 5 ⋅ A and 6 ⋅ A ), Job‐Plot analysis indicated the formation of discrete 1:1 self‐assembly species between A and 2 , 3 , 5 and 6 , respectively (see the Supporting Information)…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 40%
“…Following the same premises, four‐component nanorotors were prepared as well ,. Here, in extending the self‐sorting library in Scheme , the orthogonality of two additional dynamic interactions (see Chart 3 for HETPYP‐I: N py →[Cu(phenAr 2 )] + and N DABCO →ZnPor 2 ) is utilized in combination with cooperative effects . Obviously, without additional support, both homo‐ and heteromeric double deckers would emerge, but due to the cooperative effect of the HETPYP‐I interaction(s) (= C5 type motif) the hetero‐assembly 15 is furnished in quantitative yield (Scheme ).…”
Section: Single Self‐sorting: From Simple Order To Smart Catalytic Mamentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Four‐component assembly (rotation is invisible to NMR). Porphyrin 13 represents the stator and 14 the rotator . For the complexation motifs, see Chart 3.…”
Section: Single Self‐sorting: From Simple Order To Smart Catalytic Mamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations