2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2112.12001
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DA-FDFtNet: Dual Attention Fake Detection Fine-tuning Network to Detect Various AI-Generated Fake Images

Abstract: Due to the advancement of Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN), Autoencoders, and other AI technologies, it has been much easier to create fake images such as "Deepfakes." More recent research has introduced few-shot learning, which uses a small amount of training data to produce fake images and videos more effectively. Therefore, the ease of generating manipulated images and the difficulty of distinguishing those images can cause a serious threat to our society, such as propagating fake information. However,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effectiveness of the model was checked on eight different generative adversarial networks. While the proposed method reached 81.43% accuracy on the dataset produced with StyleGAN, it reached 83.64% accuracy on the dataset produced with StyleGAN2 ( Bang & Woo, 2021 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effectiveness of the model was checked on eight different generative adversarial networks. While the proposed method reached 81.43% accuracy on the dataset produced with StyleGAN, it reached 83.64% accuracy on the dataset produced with StyleGAN2 ( Bang & Woo, 2021 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Additionally, considering iris patterns, another study using the EfficientNet-B5 algorithm reached an accuracy rate of 91% ( Guo et al, 2022 ). Among the examined studies, the study utilizing the MobileNetV3 algorithm achieved the lowest accuracy rate of 83.64% ( Bang & Woo, 2021 ). While most of the examined studies employed deep learning methods, StyleGAN2 was preferred for generating fake face images.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%