2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.pce.2005.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences are due to that in Ref. [26] the geometrical cross sections instead of the inelastic cross sections were wrongly taken to estimate the hypernuclear yields, and breakup of the hot primary hyperresidues was not considered [49]. Actually, the production cross sections are quite sensitive to the adopted excitation energies, since the breakup probability is proportional to (E x −U ) 3n/2−5/2 , where U is the Coulomb barrier and n is the number of cold residues after breakup [46].…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences are due to that in Ref. [26] the geometrical cross sections instead of the inelastic cross sections were wrongly taken to estimate the hypernuclear yields, and breakup of the hot primary hyperresidues was not considered [49]. Actually, the production cross sections are quite sensitive to the adopted excitation energies, since the breakup probability is proportional to (E x −U ) 3n/2−5/2 , where U is the Coulomb barrier and n is the number of cold residues after breakup [46].…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being an introduction, I will not provide a detailed and long compilation of References on the various items since they can be found in the contributions to the HYP2015 Proceedings for this Topical Session by Rappold [1], by Piano [2], by Xu [3] and by Botta [4]. Another complete list of relevant References can be found in a very recent review paper on the Status and Perspectives of experimental studies on Hypernuclear Weak Decays [5].…”
Section: Remarks On the Early Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The invariant mass technique coupled to precise t.o.f. measurements allowed one to select the two-body mesonic decay and to determine a value of (183 +43 stat −32 stat ± 37 syst ) ps, as reported by Rappold [1]. In both the mentioned experiments with ions a convincing check of the reliability of the analyses was that τ Λ free , deduced from the large sample of events due to decay of free Λ's abundantly produced in the same runs, turned out to be fully consistent with the Particle Data Group value.…”
Section: The Recent Data Obtained In Experiments With Ionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation