1999
DOI: 10.1097/00004694-199905000-00017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: We reviewed 90 consecutive patients with various neuromuscular diseases and a progressive spine deformity treated with a prefabricated Boston-type underarm corrective brace. Of these, 38 patients had spastic tetraplegia; seven, syndrome-related muscular hypertonia; 24, muscular hypotonia; and 21, myelomeningocele. The mean age at the treatment start was 9.2 years (range, 1.4-17.7 years). Twenty-four were ambulating and 66 wheelchair-bound. Hypotonia was the dominant type of muscle involvement in 49, spasticity… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the curve is flexible, it is possible to reduce the progression rate and delay the need for surgery by spinal bracing (Olafsson et al. 1999, Terjesen et al. 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the curve is flexible, it is possible to reduce the progression rate and delay the need for surgery by spinal bracing (Olafsson et al. 1999, Terjesen et al. 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spinal bracing on respiratory function in neuromuscular disease results in a considerable reduction in FVC [2,11]. Olafsson et al [6] reviewed 90 patients with neuromuscular diseases and progressive spine deformity, treated with soft Boston orthosis. The mean pretreatment Cobb angle was 47°, with a mean brace-induced Cobb angle correction of 60%; after a follow-up of 3.1 years, the treatment was considered successful (\10°curve progression) in 23 patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have reported that spinal orthoses can provide functional benefits such as stability [9], head control [7, 10], and hand control [7, 8], all of which preserve and improve functional abilities that are vital to the quality of life for children with CP. Spinal orthoses appear to be effective for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis [11]; however, the results for neuromuscular scoliosis are more ambiguous [8, 9, 12]. The main indication for spinal orthoses in these patients is often to stabilize and delay the progression of the spinal curvature [8, 12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%