2003
DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200307010-00022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: Risk factors for surgical site infection in the acute trauma setting are identified. Two surgical teams may be involved without causing a higher rate of infection.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The postoperative stay of 2.92 days is 31.7 % shorter than that of patients in the SD pathway and between 33 and 65 % shorter than published averages in the North American literature [28]. This decrease in hospital stay has many potential benefits, including lessening the potential exposure to nosocomial infection [1418], a quicker transition to the home setting for patients and for parents with multiple children, and earlier return to work for the parents. Given the retrospective nature of this study, it is difficult to say what aspect of the pathway provides the biggest impact with regards to early discharge; however, the establishment of an expectation for discharge on the second hospital day is crucial to the pathway’s success [1924].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The postoperative stay of 2.92 days is 31.7 % shorter than that of patients in the SD pathway and between 33 and 65 % shorter than published averages in the North American literature [28]. This decrease in hospital stay has many potential benefits, including lessening the potential exposure to nosocomial infection [1418], a quicker transition to the home setting for patients and for parents with multiple children, and earlier return to work for the parents. Given the retrospective nature of this study, it is difficult to say what aspect of the pathway provides the biggest impact with regards to early discharge; however, the establishment of an expectation for discharge on the second hospital day is crucial to the pathway’s success [1924].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[910131517222627284147567079888996104120150154] Although the type of spinal surgery most significantly correlates with infection rates, there are multiple other preoperative, intraoperative, or postoperative factors that also contribute to the risk of infection following spinal fusions; age, male sex, steroid therapy, diabetes, smoking, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score, obesity, malnutrition, presence of comorbidities, and previous surgery [Table 1]. [523384145707682849798122123142] …”
Section: Comprehensive Literature Review Of Instrumented Spinal Infecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The USA National Healthcare Safety Network reported a mean SSI rate of 0.7% to 4.2% for spinal fusions and 0.7% to 2.3% for laminectomies [6]. Rates of infection are generally higher in non-elective instrumented spinal fusions for trauma, with reported rates up to 10% [7]. The increased cost of stay coupled with changes in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services reimbursement practices serve as strong incentives for adopting departmental and hospital policies aimed at reducing the incidence of SSI and improving patient outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%