2022
DOI: 10.3390/cells11244114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

D4Z4 Methylation Levels Combined with a Machine Learning Pipeline Highlight Single CpG Sites as Discriminating Biomarkers for FSHD Patients

Abstract: The study describes a protocol for methylation analysis integrated with Machine Learning (ML) algorithms developed to classify Facio-Scapulo-Humeral Dystrophy (FSHD) subjects. The DNA methylation levels of two D4Z4 regions (DR1 and DUX4-PAS) were assessed by an in-house protocol based on bisulfite sequencing and capillary electrophoresis, followed by statistical and ML analyses. The study involved two independent cohorts, namely a training group of 133 patients with clinical signs of FSHD and 150 healthy contr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar issues with inconclusive diagnostic analysis of FSHD based on detection of 4qA methylation levels have also been noted in recent studies. 21,22 One recent study proposed that D4Z4 hypomethylation could serve as a potentially important prognostic marker for FSHD 21 but contradicted another report that found no correlation between D4Z4 methylation levels assessed by MSRE and clinical manifestation or disease severity. 23 In this study, we stratified patients according to CpG6 methylation for univariate analysis of disease severity, which indicated that muscle weakness (measured by CS and ACSS) is more severe, and onset age of first-ever muscle weakness is earlier in patient groups with lower methylation levels (groups of LM1, LM2, and LM3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar issues with inconclusive diagnostic analysis of FSHD based on detection of 4qA methylation levels have also been noted in recent studies. 21,22 One recent study proposed that D4Z4 hypomethylation could serve as a potentially important prognostic marker for FSHD 21 but contradicted another report that found no correlation between D4Z4 methylation levels assessed by MSRE and clinical manifestation or disease severity. 23 In this study, we stratified patients according to CpG6 methylation for univariate analysis of disease severity, which indicated that muscle weakness (measured by CS and ACSS) is more severe, and onset age of first-ever muscle weakness is earlier in patient groups with lower methylation levels (groups of LM1, LM2, and LM3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Similar issues with inconclusive diagnostic analysis of FSHD based on detection of 4qA methylation levels have also been noted in recent studies. 21,22…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Caputo and colleagues [57,58] developed a protocol for methylation analysis of specific CpG residues using iMachine Learning (ML) algorithms to classify FSHD cases. Hiramuki et al , [59 ▪ ] applied long-read sequencing through a Nanopore CRISPR/Cas9-targeted resequencing to diagnose FSHD by simultaneous detection of D4Z4 repeat length and methylation status at the nucleotide level in FSHD patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study involved 335 subjects (160 FSHD patients and 175 healthy subjects), which were available from a previous study [23]. In particular, the analysis of both cohorts allowed testing the ability of the assay to detect all the methylated strands independently from the disease condition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the BSS technique allows detecting methylated and unmethylated cytosines (C) with a single‐base resolution, which, in turn, enables the assessment of methylation levels related to single CpG sites. This method has been recently applied to evaluate the methylation levels of two regions (viz., the DUX4 ‐PAS and the DR1) in FSHD patients [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%