1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0273-1177(99)90163-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

D0.3-0036 studies on the ionospheric divergent hall current

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The electrostatic ionosphere means dE rot ion (t) = 0 in the ionospheric current. Using (2), the expression of reflection coefficient of shear Alfvén waves at the electrostatic ionosphere: R A (0) = (AE A À AE P )/ (AE A + AE P ) [Scholer, 1970], and the mode conversion ratio from the rotational electric field to the divergent electric field, MC rot!div = AE H /(AE A + AE P ) [Yoshikawa andItonaga, 1996, 2000]…”
Section: Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The electrostatic ionosphere means dE rot ion (t) = 0 in the ionospheric current. Using (2), the expression of reflection coefficient of shear Alfvén waves at the electrostatic ionosphere: R A (0) = (AE A À AE P )/ (AE A + AE P ) [Scholer, 1970], and the mode conversion ratio from the rotational electric field to the divergent electric field, MC rot!div = AE H /(AE A + AE P ) [Yoshikawa andItonaga, 1996, 2000]…”
Section: Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, electrostatic conditions would be broken down for geomagnetic pulsations of which frequency is grater than those of Pc3–4 ranges [ Yoshikawa and Itonaga , 2000]. Some theoretical analyses suggest that the finite inductive rotational electric field in the ionosphere causes another type of shielding effect on δ b ⟂G for high‐conducting ionosheric condition or for high‐frequency oscillation, which is different from the ASE [ Yoshikawa , 1998; Yoshikawa and Itonaga , 2000; Nakata et al , 2000; Pilipenko et al , 2000]. However, in their treatment based on the homogeneous time‐dependent source field of exp(−iωt), the physical quantities derived from the inductive processes were mixed with that of direct response, and it is difficult to separate their relative contribution to the time‐change phenomena.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%