Abstract:This paper discusses the D-pole placement problem of discrete time-delay systems where the delay duration can be any positive integer. One sufficient condition is proposed to insure all the closed-loop eigenvalues of discrete delay systems be located inside a specific disk D(α, r). Several criteria are used to retain all the eigenvalues of discrete delay systems with structured or unstructured parametric perturbations inside the same disk. Finally, some illustrative examples are given to demonstrate our result… Show more
“…Thus, in order to get around this difficulty, all the researchers (2) -(9) directly adopted the linear discrete time-delay system (1) instead of the linear augmented discrete system (3) to develop computationally simple conditions to analyze the robustness problem of eigenvalue-clustering inside a specified region for the linear discrete time-delay system with structured (elemental) parameter uncertainties. Note that the results proposed by Hsieh et al (7), (8) can be applied to analyze the robustness problem of eigenvalue-clustering inside a specified region which may be allowed to be any shape, whereas the results given by Wang and Wang (2), (3) , Trinh and Aldeen (4) , Shyu and Liaw (5) , Chang (6) , and Chen et al (9) can only be applied to analyze the robustness problem of eigenvalueclustering within a specified circular region. For the case of eigenvalue-clustering in a circular region, the sufficient condition proposed by Hsieh et al (7), (8) is shown to be less conservative than those proposed by Wang and Wang (2), (3) , Trinh and Aldeen (4) , Shyu and Liaw (5) , and Chang (6) ; besides, it can be seen that the sufficient condition proposed by Hsieh et al (7), (8) is the generalized version of the results given by Chen et al (9) On the other hand, it is well known that an approximate system model is always used in practice and sometimes the approximation error should be covered by introducing both structured (elemental) and unstructured (norm-bounded) parameter uncertainties in control system analysis and design (10) .…”
In this paper, the problem of the regional eigenvalue-clustering robustness analysis for linear discrete time-delay systems with both structured (elemental) and unstructured (normbounded) parameter uncertainties is investigated. Under the assumption that all the eigenvalues of a linear nominal discrete time-delay system lie within a specified region, a new sufficient condition is proposed to preserve the assumed property when both the structured (elemental) and the unstructured (norm-bounded) parameter uncertainties are added into the linear nominal discrete time-delay system. No restriction is imposed on the shapes of the specified region. When all the eigenvalues are just required to locate inside the unit circle, the proposed criterion will become the robust stability criterion. For the case that the linear discrete time-delay system only subjects to structured (elemental) parameter uncertainties, by two illustrative examples, the presented sufficient condition is shown to be less conservative than the existing one reported recently in the literature.
“…Thus, in order to get around this difficulty, all the researchers (2) -(9) directly adopted the linear discrete time-delay system (1) instead of the linear augmented discrete system (3) to develop computationally simple conditions to analyze the robustness problem of eigenvalue-clustering inside a specified region for the linear discrete time-delay system with structured (elemental) parameter uncertainties. Note that the results proposed by Hsieh et al (7), (8) can be applied to analyze the robustness problem of eigenvalue-clustering inside a specified region which may be allowed to be any shape, whereas the results given by Wang and Wang (2), (3) , Trinh and Aldeen (4) , Shyu and Liaw (5) , Chang (6) , and Chen et al (9) can only be applied to analyze the robustness problem of eigenvalueclustering within a specified circular region. For the case of eigenvalue-clustering in a circular region, the sufficient condition proposed by Hsieh et al (7), (8) is shown to be less conservative than those proposed by Wang and Wang (2), (3) , Trinh and Aldeen (4) , Shyu and Liaw (5) , and Chang (6) ; besides, it can be seen that the sufficient condition proposed by Hsieh et al (7), (8) is the generalized version of the results given by Chen et al (9) On the other hand, it is well known that an approximate system model is always used in practice and sometimes the approximation error should be covered by introducing both structured (elemental) and unstructured (norm-bounded) parameter uncertainties in control system analysis and design (10) .…”
In this paper, the problem of the regional eigenvalue-clustering robustness analysis for linear discrete time-delay systems with both structured (elemental) and unstructured (normbounded) parameter uncertainties is investigated. Under the assumption that all the eigenvalues of a linear nominal discrete time-delay system lie within a specified region, a new sufficient condition is proposed to preserve the assumed property when both the structured (elemental) and the unstructured (norm-bounded) parameter uncertainties are added into the linear nominal discrete time-delay system. No restriction is imposed on the shapes of the specified region. When all the eigenvalues are just required to locate inside the unit circle, the proposed criterion will become the robust stability criterion. For the case that the linear discrete time-delay system only subjects to structured (elemental) parameter uncertainties, by two illustrative examples, the presented sufficient condition is shown to be less conservative than the existing one reported recently in the literature.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.