1990
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90267-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

D-periodic assemblies of type I procollagen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, there was no evidence of aggregation in the conditions used, consistent with the known function of the C-propeptide domain in increasing the solubility of the procollagen molecule compared with pN-collagen (procollagen minus the C-propeptide domain) by at least 100-fold (52,53). The value of the diffusion coefficient also gave information on the shape of CPIII in solution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Thus, there was no evidence of aggregation in the conditions used, consistent with the known function of the C-propeptide domain in increasing the solubility of the procollagen molecule compared with pN-collagen (procollagen minus the C-propeptide domain) by at least 100-fold (52,53). The value of the diffusion coefficient also gave information on the shape of CPIII in solution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The results of this body of work are beautifully summarized by Prockop and Hulmes 1994 (Prockop and Hulmes, 1994). Some of the more important results of these investigations demonstrate that : 1) collagen monomers are made soluble by the presence of C- and N-terminal propeptides at relatively high concentrations (up to 1.5 mg/ml in physiological buffer (Mould et al, 1990), 2) fibril diameter depends on the temperature during assembly (Kadler et al, 1990), 3) assembling fibrils possess an inherent polarity (Kadler et al, 1990), 4) assembled fibril morphology is influenced by numerous factors including the momomer concentration (Mould and Hulmes, 1987), pH (Yuan and Veis, 1973), terminal propeptides (Mould et al, 1990), other collagen monomers (Birk et al, 1990; Wenstrup et al, 2004) and proteoglycan core proteins (Brown et al, 2002). In spite of this large body of work investigating factors which control collagen fibril assembly, methods designed to control the organization of the resulting fibrils have received little attention.…”
Section: 0 Stromal Tissue Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be accomplished if the cells form stratified layers and secrete large amounts of collagen monomers into the confined space between the organized layers of cells. The most troubling part of this hypothesis is the fact that collagen should form aggregates above 1.5 mg/ml, even with intact propeptides (Mould et al, 1990). Assuming higher concentrations can be stabilized, the direction of the monomeric alignment may be controlled over short distances (and potentially long distances as well) from the cell surface via geometric features or by adhesion complexes.…”
Section: 0 Stromal Tissue Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fleischmajer et al (1988) have also demonstrated that C-propeptides are present at the surface of collagen fibrils during chick embryo skin fibrillogenesis. It is known, too, that, although pCcollagen molecules alone will not self-assemble into fibrils, they will, at a sufficiently high concentration, aggregate into D-periodic tape-like structures (Mould & Hulmes, 1987;Mould et al, 1990). It seems likely therefore that the origins of the enzyme-dependent growth behaviour described here must be sought in terms of some co-assembly of collagen and unprocessed pCcollagen, at an early stage of fibril formation, prior to C-propeptide cleavage by C-proteinase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%