2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2012.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

D-Dimer levels at different stages of pregnancy in Australian women: A single centre study using two different immunoturbidimetric assays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that D-dimer has no practical diagnostic use in pregnancy if the threshold for abnormal of 0.55 mg/L is used (cut-off out of pregnancy). The obtained results from this study are in accordance with our previously reported study and studies that included different population of pregnant women [14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suggests that D-dimer has no practical diagnostic use in pregnancy if the threshold for abnormal of 0.55 mg/L is used (cut-off out of pregnancy). The obtained results from this study are in accordance with our previously reported study and studies that included different population of pregnant women [14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, investigation of D-dimer among healthy pregnant women in different populations showed gradual increase of D-dimer which correlates with the gestational age; however, reference range varied depending on the D-dimer test (type, its sensitivity and specificity) [14][15][16][17][18], while the data about thrombin generation in normal pregnancy were scarce and conflicting [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that PE is accompanied by coagulopathies, it is probably not surprising that d -dimer levels are raised in PE (741–745), although this is true for many conditions (746), and some of the assays would bear improvement (747, 748). Needless to say, however, raised d -dimer levels are also a strong marker for infection (749, 750).…”
Section: Proteomic and Similar Biomarkers – Circulating And Placentalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D-dimer should not be used in isolation during pregnancy to rule out DVT, as levels increase with pregnancy progression and usually reach thresholds considered abnormal in nonpregnant individuals. 30 This, along with the unsuitability of Wells prediction rule in pregnant women, makes pretest probability assessment more difficult. Chan's LEFt clinical prediction tool, which uses 3 variables (symptoms in the left leg, calf circumference difference .2 cm, and first trimester presentation) is predictive of positive imaging for DVT in pregnant women and may be useful in the decisionmaking for further imaging in the case of a negative CUS.…”
Section: Dvtmentioning
confidence: 99%