D Antigen; Chances of Finding Weak D Antigen and Re-Evaluation of Its Clinical Significance as a Routine Blood Bank Procedure

Abstract

ORIGINAL PROF-3471 ABSTRACT… Background: In 1939 Rh antigen was discovered by Levine and Stetson. Rh system antigens are very immunogenic, they can produce significant Hemolytic Disease of the fetus and Newborn as well as hemolytic transfusion reactions. There are numerous variants of D, the most common subtypes are Weak D and Partial D, now called as abnormal D antigens. The incidence of Rh negativity worldwide varies between 3%-25% and that of weak D antigen ranges from 0.2%-1%. Objectives: To find out the frequency of Rh negativity and weak D antigen among the donors coming to the blood bank of The Children's Hospital & Institute of Child Health, Lahore and to review the clinical significance of weak D antigen in transfusion perspective especially its role in alloimmunization caused by Weak D antigen when transfused to Rh negative individuals. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: The Children's Hospital and Institute of Child Health, Lahore. Period: 1 st Jan 2015 to 31st May, 2015. Materials and Methods: 6320 healthy donors were randomly selected. All samples were grouped for ABO and Rh-D factor by immediate spin tube technique. All samples found Rh negative, were further processed for weak D antigen with monoclonal anti D sera by using indirect Coomb's technique. The presence of macroscopic or microscopic agglutination was recorded as Rh positive. In case there was no agglutination the mixture was washed 4 times with normal saline. After the last wash, saline was decanted and 2 drops of monoclonal, polyvalent anti human globulin was added. Macroscopic and microscopic agglutination was looked for and any agglutination at this stage was recorded as weak D antigen. Positive control (check cells i.e. washed O positive cells with diluted anti D) and negative control (washed O positive cells) were always put. Results: Among the 6320 healthy donors, 1224(19.4%) were Rh-D negative and 5096(80.6%) were Rh-D positive. Of the 1224 Rh D negative samples, 3 (0.2%) samples found positive for weak D antigen. Conclusion: The frequency of Rh negative blood group was 0.2% among the healthy donors at The Children's Hospital and ICH, Lahore. Although the frequency is low but it's proven by literature that weak D antigen can produce alloimmunization if transfused to Rh-D negative subjects. At the same time the cases of hemolytic reactions reported previously with Weak D antigen have been scarce.

Distribution of ABO and Rh blood groups among pregnant women attending the obstetrics and gynecology clinic at the Jordan University Hospital

“…Weak and partial RhD were considered as Rh positive due to our major concern in Rh D-negative pregnant females as it can produce alloimmunization if accidentally given weak/partial RhD antigen-positive blood, knowing that weak D antigen ranges from 0.2 to 1%. 8 …”