2018
DOI: 10.5603/fc.a2018.0090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Czy nie-HDL cholesterol lepiej niż cholesterol frakcji LDL odzwierciedla ryzyko sercowo-naczyniowe?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is of particular diagnostic importance if the accuracy of the LDL-C concentration calculation is limited. According to numerous studies, non-HDL-C concentration is more predictive for cardiovascular risk than LDL-C concentration [87,88]. Non-HDL-C concentration is calculated using the following formula: Non-HDL-C = TC -HDL-C (in mmol/l or mg/dl)…”
Section: Non-hdl Cholesterolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is of particular diagnostic importance if the accuracy of the LDL-C concentration calculation is limited. According to numerous studies, non-HDL-C concentration is more predictive for cardiovascular risk than LDL-C concentration [87,88]. Non-HDL-C concentration is calculated using the following formula: Non-HDL-C = TC -HDL-C (in mmol/l or mg/dl)…”
Section: Non-hdl Cholesterolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be a permanent element of the lipid profile as it represents the concentration of all atherogenic lipoprotein fractions. The available studies show that it is more predictive in CV risk assessment than LDL-C [44,45].…”
Section: Very Highmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-HDL-C calculation is more reliable than the calculation of LDL-C [45,46]. As with other formulas, the accuracy of non-HDL-C calculation depends on the biological and analytical variability of the TC and HDL-C levels.…”
Section: Very Highmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include the apoB-containing particles LDL, VLDL, IDL, CM, TRL remnants and Lp(a). Determination of non-HDL-C level is very important for cardiovascular risk assessment and, as of 2021 (Guidelines of PoLA and five other scientific societies [ 5 ]), is recommended as a permanent element of the lipid profile because it complements LDL-C by allowing the assessment of residual risk and, based on available studies, is more predictive of cardiovascular risk than LDL-C levels and most often equally predictive as apoB measurement reflecting the number of atherogenic lipoprotein particles [ 65 , 66 ]. Non-HDL-cholesterol is now also a recommended parameter in the assessment of cardiovascular risk in SCORE2 and SCORE2-OP and, according to recent Polish recommendations, is the basis for the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome [ 67 ].…”
Section: Non-hdl Cholesterolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculation of non-HDL-C is more reliable than the calculation of LDL-C [ 66 , 68 ]. Nevertheless, as with the use of other formulas, the accuracy of non-HDL-C calculation depends on the biological and analytical variability of TC and HDL-C concentrations.…”
Section: Non-hdl Cholesterolmentioning
confidence: 99%