1996
DOI: 10.1057/9780230377219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Czechoslovakia, 1918–92

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to political purges of members of rival parties, there was a mass vetting of the Communist Party itself. Fear and intimidation associated with state-sponsored terror characterized the country between 1948 and 1954 (Hodos 1987; Krejčí and Machonin 1996; Paul 1981; Pelikán 1971). Citizens lived in constant fear of persecution, and very few spoke out against the regime.…”
Section: Contextualizing the 1953 Plzeň Uprisingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to political purges of members of rival parties, there was a mass vetting of the Communist Party itself. Fear and intimidation associated with state-sponsored terror characterized the country between 1948 and 1954 (Hodos 1987; Krejčí and Machonin 1996; Paul 1981; Pelikán 1971). Citizens lived in constant fear of persecution, and very few spoke out against the regime.…”
Section: Contextualizing the 1953 Plzeň Uprisingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once in power, the KSČ set out to nationalize and restructure the economy around heavy industry, including the production of armaments and machinery for export to other state socialist countries (Krejčí and Machonin 1996). Plzeň was home to several manufacturing facilities, but the industrial centerpiece was the massive Škoda Works factory that employed more than 25,000 workers.…”
Section: Contextualizing the 1953 Plzeň Uprisingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 1948 coup d’état brought the Soviet-backed Communist Party of Czechoslovakia ( Komunistická strana Československa , KSČ) to political power. The KSČ immediately began transforming the economy by nationalizing businesses, forcing farmers to join state-run collectives, and restructuring production around heavy industry (Krejčí and Machonin 1996; Mikuš 1963). In the political sphere, the party launched an aggressive campaign to eliminate opposition and solidify their base of support among the country’s working class.…”
Section: Case Context: Repression and Human Rights In Czechoslovakiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The KSČ’s authoritarian rule took on its most violent form during the Stalinist era, between 1948 and the mid-1960s. During this time, fear permeated the country and power was consolidated through widespread political repression (Krejčí and Machonin 1996; Pelikán 1971). The new political and economic structures were upheld ideologically through Soviet edicts of class warfare.…”
Section: Case Context: Repression and Human Rights In Czechoslovakiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Modernizers, headed by Peter Weiss, took over the leadership of the party in December 1989, and they sought a fast-track transformation of the KSS into a non-communist party. In the elections of June 1990 the party polled 13.3 per cent of the vote and became the fourth strongest in parliament.…”
Section: Post-communist Transformation and Political Opportunitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%