2007
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-89132007000400009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of untreated hospital effluents

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The residues associated with patient excretions may also contain several products with mutagenic activity. Ortolan and Ayub, (2007), reported the possible presence of cytotoxic (that is, cell direct toxicity) and genotoxic activities in the effluents of a typically large general hospital, in de Porto Alegre, a big southern city of Brazil. Antibiotics which form a good percentage of hospital effluents such as Ofloxacin was found to be genotoxic, and sulfamethoxazole, Ofloxacin and Limcomycin were mutagenic in Ames test and SOS Chromotest (Hartmann et al, 2001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The residues associated with patient excretions may also contain several products with mutagenic activity. Ortolan and Ayub, (2007), reported the possible presence of cytotoxic (that is, cell direct toxicity) and genotoxic activities in the effluents of a typically large general hospital, in de Porto Alegre, a big southern city of Brazil. Antibiotics which form a good percentage of hospital effluents such as Ofloxacin was found to be genotoxic, and sulfamethoxazole, Ofloxacin and Limcomycin were mutagenic in Ames test and SOS Chromotest (Hartmann et al, 2001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hospital wastewaters (WWs) are a considerable problem in public health care due to the huge amount of chemicals released into the environment. 1,2 On the other hand, hospital WWs are the foremost source of pathogenic and antibioticresistant organisms that are released into the environment. 3 Since these effluents are discharged as conventional urban effluents to the municipal sewage system without prior treatment and there is also frequent disposal of the treated WW in surface waters, there is widespread contamination of natural waters with emerging contaminants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, in this study, all of the calculated CIF values were obtained to be below the 1.5 threshold level (Kocak et al, 2010, Legault et al, 1996, Guzzella et al, 2006, Cachot et al, 2006, Gebel and Koenig, 1999, Ortolan and Ayub, 2007. When the CIF for any of the test concentrations reached 1.5, the test substance was scored as a significant genotoxic.…”
Section: Sos Chromotest Responsesmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The criterion to consider a sample as positive in the SOS chromotest differs between authors (Kocak et al, 2010;Legault et al, 1996;Guzzella et al, 2006;Cachot et al, 2006;Gebel and Koenig, 1999;Ortolan and Ayub, 2007) (Table 1). Guzzella et al, (2006), Italy Legault et al, (1996) Prior to applying the parametric test, the Shapiro-Wilk W and the Levene's tests were consecutively implemented as preconditions, in order to appraise whether the obtained CIF subsets of 2013 Spring and 2013 Summer had either a normal or a non-normal distribution, and to evaluate whether the variances (or standard deviations) of the paired groups were either homogeneous or unequal.…”
Section: Determination Of Genotoxic Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%