2010
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01678-09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytospin-Enhanced Immunofluorescence and Impact of Sample Quality on Detection of Novel Swine Origin (H1N1) Influenza Virus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another limitation is the antigenic variability of some targeted viruses, which can vary from year to year, especially for influenza; thus the performance of a particular kit may vary from year to year. When a novel variant emerges, such as pandemic influenza A H1N1, the performance of antigen tests for the detection of the new strain is not known, and indeed for pandemic H1N1 influenza, was lower than for seasonal influenza (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009;Ginocchio et al, 2009;Landry and Ferguson, 2010). In these cases, clinical diagnosis and other testing modalities are essential.…”
Section: Viral Antigen Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another limitation is the antigenic variability of some targeted viruses, which can vary from year to year, especially for influenza; thus the performance of a particular kit may vary from year to year. When a novel variant emerges, such as pandemic influenza A H1N1, the performance of antigen tests for the detection of the new strain is not known, and indeed for pandemic H1N1 influenza, was lower than for seasonal influenza (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009;Ginocchio et al, 2009;Landry and Ferguson, 2010). In these cases, clinical diagnosis and other testing modalities are essential.…”
Section: Viral Antigen Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advantages of DFA over other antigen detection methods include greater sensitivity, ability to assess sample adequacy (i.e., sufficient numbers of target cells), and ability to detect multiple viruses in a single test (Chan et al, 2001). Limitations include the need for sufficient target cells, a fluorescence microscope, a dark room, meticulous technique in slide preparation, and expertise in interpretation to distinguish specific from non-specific staining (Landry and Ferguson, 2010). Assay time is 2 hours, which is longer than simpler rapid tests (Landry, 2009b).…”
Section: Immunofluorescencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] We compared centrifuge-enhanced DFA staining to real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (rtRT-PCR) for the detection of novel 2009 influenza A (H1N1). Nasopharyngeal (N = 187) specimens were evaluated by the Diagnostic HYBRIDS D 3 Ultra DFA (D 3 ) staining kit and ProdesseProFlu+ assay (PF+) on the Abbott m2000 system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A rapid laboratory diagnosis can facilitate early antiviral therapy, discontinuation of antibiotics, and implementation of infection control measures (1). Our laboratory uses the cytospin-enhanced direct fluorescent-antibody assay (DFA) as an initial on-demand screen and laboratory-developed real-time TaqMan (LDT) PCR when greater sensitivity is needed (2). In this report, we evaluated Simplexa Flu A/B & RSV PCR as a potential replacement for DFA and LDT PCR.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For influenza detection and subtyping, the CDC real-time reverse transcriptase (RT) PCR primers and probes were used (2). For RSV, the protocol published by van Elden et al (4) was used, but the subtypes were not differentiated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%