2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c01190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytosolic Protein Delivery for Intracellular Antigen Targeting Using Supercharged Polypeptide Delivery Platform

Abstract: Despite the well-recognized clinical success of therapeutic proteins, especially antibodies, their inability to penetrate the cell membrane restricts them to secretory extracellular or membrane-associated targets. Developing a direct cytosolic protein delivery system would offer unique opportunities for intracellular target-related therapeutic proteins. Here, we generated a supercharged polypeptide (SCP) with high cellular uptake efficiency, endosomal escape ability, and good biosafety and developed an SCP wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the obstacle that proteins are often incorporated into a cell by endocytosis and are confined within endosomes has not been completely overcome. Several different peptides and their modified versions have been tested for more efficient endosomal escape [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ]. Due to the technological demands for quick protein delivery to cells with fewer technical requirements, membrane-lytic peptides are receiving more attention from researchers in the twenty-first century.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the obstacle that proteins are often incorporated into a cell by endocytosis and are confined within endosomes has not been completely overcome. Several different peptides and their modified versions have been tested for more efficient endosomal escape [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ]. Due to the technological demands for quick protein delivery to cells with fewer technical requirements, membrane-lytic peptides are receiving more attention from researchers in the twenty-first century.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 As the significance of intracellular protein delivery has been well recognized, multiple methods were developed for cellular protein delivery including physical methods, cell-penetrating peptides, polyethyleneimine, supercharged molecules, and nanocarriers in the past decades. [7][8][9][10][11] Most of these transportation systems have remained limitations in different aspects. Physical methods such as electroporation, microinjection, or microinjection, mainly use physical forces to temporally generate pores on the cell membrane to allow proteins to transport into cells, but they often induce damage to cell membranes and have limited throughput.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein-based therapeutics have achieved great success in the drug markert. , Proteins such as insulin, growth factors, interferon and monoclonal antibodies have been approved for the treatment of various diseases, , and they have emerged as high potent and selective alternatives to small-molecule drugs . However, the clinically approved protein drugs are limited to extracellular targets and suffered from poor proteolytic stability and membrane impermeability. , Efficient intracellular protein delivery technologies could promote the development of protein drugs acting on intracellular targets. Over the past decades, various strategies have been developed for intracellular protein delivery, especially lipid nanoparticles, peptides, polymers, and inorganic nanomaterials. However, these delivery systems are usually associated with poor serum tolerance due to the competitive binding of serum proteins to the vectors during delivery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%