Abstract:Allogeneic chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CART) therapies require multiple gene edits to be clinically tractable. Most allogeneic CART have been created using gene editing techniques that induce DNA double-stranded breaks (DSBs), resulting in unintended on-target editing outcomes with potentially unforeseen consequences. Cytosine base editors (CBEs) install C•G to T•A point mutations in T cells with between 90-99% efficiency to silence gene expression without creating DSBs, greatly reducing or eliminating u… Show more
“…Increasing the efficacy and reducing the toxicity of gene editing allows optimized cell yields for therapeutic applications. In line with previous reports 22,28,38,46 , co-transfection of base-modified mRNA encoding for 8 th generation adenine BEs achieved highly efficient editing at two sites ( Figure 2, 5, 6 ). Most groups reported the combination of retroviral gene transfer and multiplex editing in separate steps 22,26,28 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In line with previous reports 22,28,38,46 , co-transfection of base-modified mRNA encoding for 8 th generation adenine BEs achieved highly efficient editing at two sites ( Figure 2, 5, 6 ). Most groups reported the combination of retroviral gene transfer and multiplex editing in separate steps 22,26,28 . Diorio et al combined cytosine base editing for B2M silencing with a Cas12b nuclease for AAV6-assisted GFP KI but did not investigate translocations in this experiment 22 .…”
Multiple genetic modifications may be required to develop potent off-the-shelf chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies. Conventional CRISPR-Cas nucleases install sequence-specific DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), enabling gene knock-out (KO) or targeted transgene knock-in (KI). However, simultaneous DSBs provoke a high rate of genomic rearrangements which may impede the safety of the edited cells. Here, we combine a non-viral CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease-assisted KI and Cas9-derived base editing technology for DSB free KOs within a single intervention. We demonstrate efficient insertion of a CAR into the T cell receptor alpha constant (TRAC) gene, along with two KOs that silence major histocompatibility complexes (MHC) class I and II expression. This approach reduced translocations to 1.5% of edited cells. Small insertions and deletion at the base editing target sites indicated guide RNA exchange between the editors. This was overcome by using CRISPR enzymes of distinct evolutionary origins. Combining Cas12a Ultra for CAR KI and a Cas9-derived base editor enabled the efficient generation of triple-edited CAR T cells with a translocation frequency comparable to unedited T cells. Resulting T cell receptor- (TCR-) and MHC-negative CAR T cells resisted allogeneic T cell targeting in vitro. Thus, we demonstrate a solution for safer multiplex-edited cell products and a path towards off-the-shelf CAR therapeutics.
“…Increasing the efficacy and reducing the toxicity of gene editing allows optimized cell yields for therapeutic applications. In line with previous reports 22,28,38,46 , co-transfection of base-modified mRNA encoding for 8 th generation adenine BEs achieved highly efficient editing at two sites ( Figure 2, 5, 6 ). Most groups reported the combination of retroviral gene transfer and multiplex editing in separate steps 22,26,28 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In line with previous reports 22,28,38,46 , co-transfection of base-modified mRNA encoding for 8 th generation adenine BEs achieved highly efficient editing at two sites ( Figure 2, 5, 6 ). Most groups reported the combination of retroviral gene transfer and multiplex editing in separate steps 22,26,28 . Diorio et al combined cytosine base editing for B2M silencing with a Cas12b nuclease for AAV6-assisted GFP KI but did not investigate translocations in this experiment 22 .…”
Multiple genetic modifications may be required to develop potent off-the-shelf chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies. Conventional CRISPR-Cas nucleases install sequence-specific DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), enabling gene knock-out (KO) or targeted transgene knock-in (KI). However, simultaneous DSBs provoke a high rate of genomic rearrangements which may impede the safety of the edited cells. Here, we combine a non-viral CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease-assisted KI and Cas9-derived base editing technology for DSB free KOs within a single intervention. We demonstrate efficient insertion of a CAR into the T cell receptor alpha constant (TRAC) gene, along with two KOs that silence major histocompatibility complexes (MHC) class I and II expression. This approach reduced translocations to 1.5% of edited cells. Small insertions and deletion at the base editing target sites indicated guide RNA exchange between the editors. This was overcome by using CRISPR enzymes of distinct evolutionary origins. Combining Cas12a Ultra for CAR KI and a Cas9-derived base editor enabled the efficient generation of triple-edited CAR T cells with a translocation frequency comparable to unedited T cells. Resulting T cell receptor- (TCR-) and MHC-negative CAR T cells resisted allogeneic T cell targeting in vitro. Thus, we demonstrate a solution for safer multiplex-edited cell products and a path towards off-the-shelf CAR therapeutics.
“…These include gross chromosomal rearrangements such as translocations ( Bothmer et al, 2020 ; Stadtmauer et al, 2020 ; Samuelson et al, 2021 ), chromothripsis ( Leibowitz et al, 2021 ), and aneuploidy ( Amendola et al, 2022 ; Nahmad et al, 2022 ). Translocation events most often occur as a consequence of: 1) on-target cleavage and recombination with a homologous region of the genome ( Turchiano et al, 2021 ); 2) simultaneous cleavage at an on-target and off-target sequence ( Lattanzi et al, 2021 ); or 3) following multiple on-target cleavage events in multiplexed editing workflows ( Qasim et al, 2017 ; Bothmer et al, 2020 ; Stadtmauer et al, 2020 ; Samuelson et al, 2021 ; Diorio et al, 2022 ). In addition, large-scale deletions either surrounding the cut site or of the distal end of the chromosome can occur ( Cullot et al, 2019 ), as well as copy-neutral loss-of-heterozygosity ( Boutin et al, 2021 ).…”
The discovery of CRISPR has allowed site-specific genomic modification to become a reality and this technology is now being applied in a number of human clinical trials. While this technology has demonstrated impressive efficacy in the clinic to date, there remains the potential for unintended on- and off-target effects of CRISPR nuclease activity. A variety of in silico-based prediction tools and empirically derived experimental methods have been developed to identify the most common unintended effect—small insertions and deletions at genomic sites with homology to the guide RNA. However, large-scale aberrations have recently been reported such as translocations, inversions, deletions, and even chromothripsis. These are more difficult to detect using current workflows indicating a major unmet need in the field. In this review we summarize potential sequencing-based solutions that may be able to detect these large-scale effects even at low frequencies of occurrence. In addition, many of the current clinical trials using CRISPR involve ex vivo isolation of a patient’s own stem cells, modification, and re-transplantation. However, there is growing interest in direct, in vivo delivery of genome editing tools. While this strategy has the potential to address disease in cell types that are not amenable to ex vivo manipulation, in vivo editing has only one desired outcome—on-target editing in the cell type of interest. CRISPR activity in unintended cell types (both on- and off-target) is therefore a major safety as well as ethical concern in tissues that could enable germline transmission. In this review, we have summarized the strengths and weaknesses of current editing and delivery tools and potential improvements to off-target and off-tissue CRISPR activity detection. We have also outlined potential mitigation strategies that will ensure that the safety of CRISPR keeps pace with efficacy, a necessary requirement if this technology is to realize its full translational potential.
“…Unlike the induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) technique used in the manufacture of most allogeneic CAR-T cells, CBEs create point mutations in T cells that silence gene expression without DSBs with an efficiency of 90 to 99%, significantly reducing the incidence of unexpected target editing results [94][95][96]. Allogeneic CD7 CAR-T cells developed based on CBEs are highly effective against T-ALL cells in a CD7+ T-ALL cell line CCRF-CEM, a model constructed by transplanting CCRF-GFP-Luc cells in NSG mice, and a mouse model created from patient-derived xenografts [96]. In addition, the removal of CD7 expression on the surface of T cells by gene editing technology could significantly inhibit the fratricide of CAR-T cells and reduce the risk of side effects.…”
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell (CAR-T cell) therapy based on gene editing technology represents a significant breakthrough in personalized immunotherapy for human cancer. This strategy uses genetic modification to enable T cells to target tumor-specific antigens, attack specific cancer cells, and bypass tumor cell apoptosis avoidance mechanisms to some extent. This method has been extensively used to treat hematologic diseases, but the therapeutic effect in solid tumors is not ideal. Tumor antigen escape, treatment-related toxicity, and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) limit their use of it. Target selection is the most critical aspect in determining the prognosis of patients receiving this treatment. This review provides a comprehensive summary of all therapeutic targets used in the clinic or shown promising potential. We summarize CAR-T cell therapies’ clinical trials, applications, research frontiers, and limitations in treating different cancers. We also explore coping strategies when encountering sub-optimal tumor-associated antigens (TAA) or TAA loss. Moreover, the importance of CAR-T cell therapy in cancer immunotherapy is emphasized.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.