2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-004-7461-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytoreductive Surgery and Intraperitoneal Chemohyperthermia for Recurrent Peritoneal Carcinomatosis from Ovarian Cancer

Abstract: Aggressive surgical cytoreduction has been shown to have a positive impact on survival of patients with ovarian cancer. After first-line chemotherapy, 47% of patients relapse within 5 years, and median survival after second line chemotherapy is 10-15 months. Adding intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia (IPCH) to surgical cytoreduction could further control ceolomic spread of disease. The aim of this study was to determine morbidity and mortality, regional relapse-free survival and, preliminarily, overall survival … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
47
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
6
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…15,16 Although peritonectomy procedures with HIPEC found favor later in ovarian carcinomatosis than in other carcinomatoses, in recent years this therapeutic strategy has attracted growing interest. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] The discrepant results from the various case series nevertheless leave several questions unclear, most important, the selection of patients according to the disease setting (primary or secondary cytoreduction) and extent of carcinomatosis, criteria for classifying intraperitoneal disease spread, and surgical techniques.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,16 Although peritonectomy procedures with HIPEC found favor later in ovarian carcinomatosis than in other carcinomatoses, in recent years this therapeutic strategy has attracted growing interest. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] The discrepant results from the various case series nevertheless leave several questions unclear, most important, the selection of patients according to the disease setting (primary or secondary cytoreduction) and extent of carcinomatosis, criteria for classifying intraperitoneal disease spread, and surgical techniques.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The completeness of cytoreduction, and the extent of peritoneal dissemination are consistently found to be significant prognostic indicators of survival Piso et al, 2004;Gilly et al, 2006;Di Giorgio et al, 2008;Tentes et al, 2010;Zanon et al, 2004;Rufian et al, 2006). Prior surgical score has been identified as a prognostic indicator of survival in one study (Look et al, 2004).…”
Section: Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior surgical score has been identified as a prognostic indicator of survival in one study (Look et al, 2004). Median and 5-year survival rate varies from 18-54 months and 12-66% respectively (Piso et al, 2004;Raspagliesi et al, 2006;Di Giorgio et al, 2008;Tentes et al 2010, Ryu et al, 2004Zanon et al, 2004;Rufian et al, 2006;de Bree et al, 2003;Bae et al, 2007;Ceelen et al, 2009) ( Table 2). All these studies are prospective but not randomized (evidence level 4) and demonstrate that the method is feasible, well tolerated by the patients, and the results are equivalent or even improved if compared to historical data.…”
Section: Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recurrent or persistent disease: the use of intraperitoneal CMT extended the period of progression of OC lesion from 10 to 21.8 months [Zanon, 2004;Helm, 2007]. -As first-line therapy: although logical, it is recommended an aggressive approach of OC, but when it was applied, the number of cases was too small for a conclusion [Piso, 2004].…”
Section: Route Of Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%