2019
DOI: 10.1159/000497111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CytoProcessor<sup>TM</sup>: A New Cervical Cancer Screening System for Remote Diagnosis

Abstract: Background: Current automated cervical cytology screening systems still heavily depend on manipulation of glass slides. We developed a new system called CytoProcessorTM (DATEXIM, Caen, France), which increases sensitivity and takes advantage of virtual slide technology to simplify the workflow and save worker time. We used an approach based on artificial intelligence to identify abnormal cells among the tens of thousands in a cervical preparation. Objectives: We set out to compare the diagnostic sen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The risk of a false-negative diagnosis was remarkably low (1.4%), despite the challenges of Novaprep slides. This was nearly identical to that observed in our previous study (1.5% risk of false-negative) which incorporated a larger test population of 1352 cases 7. In the context of the routine workflow, this performance was obtained with the added benefit of approximately 1.6 times faster diagnosis.As explained in Section 2, there were significant biases against CytoProcessor.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The risk of a false-negative diagnosis was remarkably low (1.4%), despite the challenges of Novaprep slides. This was nearly identical to that observed in our previous study (1.5% risk of false-negative) which incorporated a larger test population of 1352 cases 7. In the context of the routine workflow, this performance was obtained with the added benefit of approximately 1.6 times faster diagnosis.As explained in Section 2, there were significant biases against CytoProcessor.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…The elimination of slide handling steps in the CytoProcessor workflow saves a further 10.85 min for every 100 slides (transferring slides to trays, transferring trays to screeners and pathologists, matching slides with data sheets, distributing slides to screeners; data from Reference ). The only additional manual step required in the CytoProcessor workflow compared to the conventional workflow is loading the scanner, which requires approximately 4.5 min per 100 slides.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations