2016
DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(15)00289-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytomegalovirus viral load and mortality after haemopoietic stem cell transplantation in the era of pre-emptive therapy: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract: SummaryBackgroundWhile CMV viral load (CMV-VL) is commonly used to guide preemptive therapy in the post-transplant setting, there is little data correlating viremia with clinical endpoints. We therefore investigated the association of CMV-VL with mortality in the first year after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT).MethodsThis cohort study included patients who received an allogeneic HCT between 01 January 2007 and 28 February 2013, were CMV seropositive or had a seropositive donor, and underwent weekly p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
271
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 317 publications
(286 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(37 reference statements)
12
271
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These models were implemented as shown in Equation 4: where k a is the activation rate constant, k a_0 is the activation rate constant when tacrolimus and sirolimus concentrations are 0, θ T is the parameter quantifying the effect of tacrolimus concentration, C T is the concentration of tacrolimus, θ S is the parameter quantifying the effect of sirolimus concentration, and C s is the concentration of sirolimus. A negative exponential model was used to describe the effect of sirolimus on k a , preventing k a, values from becoming negative at high sirolimus concentrations.…”
Section: Serostatus Combinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These models were implemented as shown in Equation 4: where k a is the activation rate constant, k a_0 is the activation rate constant when tacrolimus and sirolimus concentrations are 0, θ T is the parameter quantifying the effect of tacrolimus concentration, C T is the concentration of tacrolimus, θ S is the parameter quantifying the effect of sirolimus concentration, and C s is the concentration of sirolimus. A negative exponential model was used to describe the effect of sirolimus on k a , preventing k a, values from becoming negative at high sirolimus concentrations.…”
Section: Serostatus Combinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12][13][14] Allo-HSCT is also characterized by shorter sirolimus exposure times (the scheduled reduction of immunosuppressant drugs promotes the immunotolerance phenomena), the more common use of drugs with potential drug-drug interactions (ie, triazoles), and with conditions related to variable absorption capacities (mucositis, nausea, vomiting, and/or diarrhea associated with conditioning regimens, drugs, or graft-versus-host disease [GvHD]) that produce large concentration fluctuations and/ or treatment interruptions. However, CMV DNAemia is a common and complex phenomenon after allo-HSCT (>70% of the recipients) 4,12 and its analysis is particularly challenging. Exposure-response analyses are of utmost importance because exposure variability results in different anti-CMV activity patterns for different drugs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-level CMV reactivation was defined as more than 1000 CMV DNA copies/ mL plasma or more than 10 pp65 antigen-positive cells per 200 000 peripheral blood leukocytes. 22,23 Overall mortality was defined as mortality occurring for any reason. Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was defined as mortality occurring for reasons other than relapse in patients receiving myeloablative HCTs or for reasons other than relapse or progression of underlying disease in patients receiving nonmyeloablative HCTs.…”
Section: Clinical Data and Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An association between CMV viral load with lower survival has been recently reported 25 and corroborated in the prospective study of CMV prevention with letermovir 18 . A larger sample size or longer follow up may have demonstrated significant differences in TCD recipients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%