2016
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-04-713644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytomegalovirus replication reduces the relapse incidence in patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also observed that clinical outcomes were poorer when HSCT recipients developed CMV‐I; however, the basis for this effect remains unclear. Recent data suggest that, although CMV‐I may be protective against relapse, particularly in HSCT recipients with AML undergoing myeloablative allogeneic HSCT, this effect is superseded by an increased non‐relapse mortality risk . When analyzed using a robust Markov multi‐state model, accounting for AML and myeloablative conditioning as well as time‐dependent GVHD, we observed that the directionality of the effect of CMV‐I on relapse favored a greater hazard of relapse, although the CI was greater than one.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We also observed that clinical outcomes were poorer when HSCT recipients developed CMV‐I; however, the basis for this effect remains unclear. Recent data suggest that, although CMV‐I may be protective against relapse, particularly in HSCT recipients with AML undergoing myeloablative allogeneic HSCT, this effect is superseded by an increased non‐relapse mortality risk . When analyzed using a robust Markov multi‐state model, accounting for AML and myeloablative conditioning as well as time‐dependent GVHD, we observed that the directionality of the effect of CMV‐I on relapse favored a greater hazard of relapse, although the CI was greater than one.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Recent data suggest that, although CMV-I may be protective against relapse, particularly in HSCT recipients with AML undergoing myeloablative allogeneic HSCT, this effect is superseded by an increased non-relapse mortality risk. 2,4,6,8,9,30 When analyzed using a robust Markov multi-state model, accounting for AML and myeloablative conditioning as well as time-dependent GVHD, we observed that the directionality of the effect of CMV-I on relapse favored a greater hazard of relapse, although the CI was greater than one. Using the same Markov multi-state model to account for the effect of CMV-I on mortality independent of the competing risk of relapse, we noted a plausible association, although again this did not reach statistical significance (lower limit of the CI was 0.9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Natural killer, CD8 and gamma/delta T cells have been shown to be stimulated by CMV reactivation and could cross-react with both viruses and leukemic cells. [17] Moreover, a direct CMV's cytotoxic effect had recently been shown against blast cells, inducing apoptosis. [18] However, viral reactivations are still associated with an increased risk of NRM and thus, choosing a donor according to CMV serostatus has now become a dilemma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%