2015
DOI: 10.1080/00087114.2015.1109940
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytological studies of sporophytic and gametophytic generation of two bulbaceous speciesLedebouria revolutaandDrimiopsis botryoides(Asparagaceae)

Abstract: Detailed cytological characteristics of both sporophytic as well as gametophytic generation of two bulbaceous species, Ledebouria revoluta and Drimiopsis botryoides, were studied by investigating together pollen mitosis and root tip mitosis along with meiosis. A comparative study showed there was no significant difference between chromosome characteristics of haploid and diploid plants. The chromosome number of L. revoluta was 2n = 30 (in root tip) and n = 15 (in pollen) and that of D. botryoides was 2n = 66 (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the regenerated and parental plants of our experiments contained 2n = 30 chromosomes, which are corroborated with the previous cytological report of L. revoluta [36]. Variations in chromosome number and structure are the commonly observed chromosomal abnormalities in callus cells and the plants regenerated from them [10], [13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…All the regenerated and parental plants of our experiments contained 2n = 30 chromosomes, which are corroborated with the previous cytological report of L. revoluta [36]. Variations in chromosome number and structure are the commonly observed chromosomal abnormalities in callus cells and the plants regenerated from them [10], [13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…2n = 20, 22, 26, 30, 38, 40, 44, 45, 46, 58, 60, 64, 68 were reported as the chromosome number of of L. revoluta (Raghavan and Venkatasubban 1940a, b;Sheriff and Murthy 1946;Rao 1954;Ratter and Milne 1973;Sen 1973a, b;Sheriff 1979;Sarkar et al 1980;Valdes-Bermejo 1980;Sheriff and Rao 1981;Subramanian 1981;Chakraborti & Sen 1983;Mathew 1988, 1990;Dixit et al, 1989;Nair 1989;Chakravarty and Sen 1992;Stedje 1996;Johnson and Brandham 1997;Sheeba and Vijayavalli 1998;Haque and Ghosh 2015), this species has a large variation of the chromosome number. And n = 10, 11, 17 and 30 were reported on L. floribunda (Jessop 1972) which was reported n = 18 or 19 (Jessop 1970), this species also showed a large variation on the chromosome number.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cytogenetically, it is a complex with various chromosome counts on record, viz. 2n=80 (Matsuura and Suto 1935); 2n= 68 (Mahalakshmi and Sheriff 1970); 2n= 66 (Sharma 1970);2n= 66, 68, 126 (Sen 1973); 2n= 60 (Vij et al 1982); 2n= 44, 55 (Stedje and Nordal 1987); 2n=30 (Vijayavalli and Mathew 1988); 2n= 44, 55, 66 (Stedje 1994) and 2n= 66 (Haque and Ghosh 2016). Chromosome number is the most frequently documented cytological character.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chromosome number, size, symmetry, position of the centromere, secondary constriction, and heterochromatic regions are the mainly used diagnostic chromosomal landmarks used in comparative analysis (Vimala et al 2021). Expensive techniques including chromosome banding and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) may be necessary to establish a relationship between taxa with uniform (symmetric) karyotypes; however, taxa with asymmetric karyotypes can be studied with simple squashing and conventional staining with orcein/carmine (Haque and Ghosh 2016). The structure and behavior of plant chromosomes during reduction division is important because the genetic variation of both gametes and the future sporophyte depends on it (Haque and Ghosh 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation