2015
DOI: 10.4314/ajtcam.v12i6.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytological effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields and static magnetic fields induced by a therapeutic device on <i>in vivo</i> exposed rats

Abstract: Background: There is a trend towards the use of magnetic fields in medicine. Pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs) technology was based upon 20 years of fundamental studies on the electromechanical properties of bone and other connective tissues. More recently, these magnetic fields have been used to treat several health conditions. There remains continuing concern that exposure to electromagnetic devices may cause adverse effects. The aim of the present study was to investigate the cytological effects induced… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have evaluated the genotoxic effect induced in PEMF-exposed rats, using a patented medical device (US patent 6,235,251 B1). The cytological endpoints included acridine orange fluorescent-staining micronucleus test and male germ cells analysis and the observed results showed that the applied magnetic fields generated by the therapeutic device did not have any detectable genotoxic effect in exposed rats, compared with the unexposed controls [56].…”
Section: Elf-emfs In Pre-clinical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We have evaluated the genotoxic effect induced in PEMF-exposed rats, using a patented medical device (US patent 6,235,251 B1). The cytological endpoints included acridine orange fluorescent-staining micronucleus test and male germ cells analysis and the observed results showed that the applied magnetic fields generated by the therapeutic device did not have any detectable genotoxic effect in exposed rats, compared with the unexposed controls [56].…”
Section: Elf-emfs In Pre-clinical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 97%