1987
DOI: 10.5795/jjscc.26.87
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytologic examination of pancreatic juice, bile and duodenal juice in the diagnosis of pancreatic and biliary tract cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because pancreatic secretions may cause cell degeneration, the number of cells that are present may be small and difficult to interpret, and cancer cells may be small and atypical in size and shape. The false-positive rate for benign pancreatic disease is reported to be 5.0% on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) ( 14 ), and the false positive rate for EUS-FNA cytology of solid pancreatic lesions was 1.1% (4/367) when only “positive” and 3.8% (14/367) when both “suspicious” and “positive” ( 15 ). Kobayashi et al reported that in false-positive cases of pancreatitis, when inflammation is severe and repetitive, degenerative processes (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because pancreatic secretions may cause cell degeneration, the number of cells that are present may be small and difficult to interpret, and cancer cells may be small and atypical in size and shape. The false-positive rate for benign pancreatic disease is reported to be 5.0% on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) ( 14 ), and the false positive rate for EUS-FNA cytology of solid pancreatic lesions was 1.1% (4/367) when only “positive” and 3.8% (14/367) when both “suspicious” and “positive” ( 15 ). Kobayashi et al reported that in false-positive cases of pancreatitis, when inflammation is severe and repetitive, degenerative processes (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%