1990
DOI: 10.1016/0165-4608(90)90007-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytogenetic studies of endometrial malignancies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies also frequently found gain of or from the long arm of chromosome 1 in endometrial carcinomas, and this finding is registered in 39 of 111 cases (35%) in the Mitelman database (2003), in six of which it is the sole abnormality. Milatovich et al (1990) suggested that aberrations of chromosome 1 represent a primary change in endometrial cancer because they are sometimes seen as the sole abnormality. As we now have confirmed that such changes indeed do occur nonrandomly in endometrial carcinomas, sometimes in the absence of other abnormalities, they undoubtedly meet the criteria for acceptance as primary chromosomal aberrations of this tumor type.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Previous studies also frequently found gain of or from the long arm of chromosome 1 in endometrial carcinomas, and this finding is registered in 39 of 111 cases (35%) in the Mitelman database (2003), in six of which it is the sole abnormality. Milatovich et al (1990) suggested that aberrations of chromosome 1 represent a primary change in endometrial cancer because they are sometimes seen as the sole abnormality. As we now have confirmed that such changes indeed do occur nonrandomly in endometrial carcinomas, sometimes in the absence of other abnormalities, they undoubtedly meet the criteria for acceptance as primary chromosomal aberrations of this tumor type.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The predominant abnormality was trisomy or tetrasomy 1q, which occurred in about 72% of the tumors examined, and the second most frequent was trisomy 10, found in 40% of the tumors (Sandberg, 1990). Only a few cytogenetic studies of human uterine carcinosarcomas have been reported (Emoto et al, 1992;Fujita et al, 1985;Harker et al, 1983;Milatovich et al, 1990). Among solid tumors, one had a modal number of 56 with many rearranged chromosomes, including i (14q) and ϩ16p (Fujita et al, 1985), and 3 of 6 homologous endometrial carcinosarcomas had structural abnormalities of chromosomes 1, 3 and 5 (Milatovich et al, 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few cytogenetic studies of human uterine carcinosarcomas have been reported (Emoto et al, 1992;Fujita et al, 1985;Harker et al, 1983;Milatovich et al, 1990). Among solid tumors, one had a modal number of 56 with many rearranged chromosomes, including i (14q) and ϩ16p (Fujita et al, 1985), and 3 of 6 homologous endometrial carcinosarcomas had structural abnormalities of chromosomes 1, 3 and 5 (Milatovich et al, 1990). Studies on uterine-carcinosarcoma cell lines in culture showed that one cell line had 45, XX, Ϫ5, Ϫ6, Ϫ7 ϩt(5q,6p) and ϩmar1 (Harker et al, 1983) and 2 others had different chromosomal abnormalities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of this alteration has been the subject of varyingly satisfactory explanations. Suzuki et al (1997) discussed the formerly known cytogenetic alterations in endometrial carcinomas, in which chromosome 1 often showed isochromosome formation (Milatovich et al, 1990). Furthermore, Sonoda et al (1997) discussed proto-oncogenes such as SKI and TRK which are located in 1q.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%