2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2006.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytogenetic Profile of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Oman

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
5
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This was similar to that reported by Secker-Walker et al [16] and by Udayakmar et al [10] but lower to that reported by Williams et al [17] and Jarosova et al [18] who detected abnormal karyotypes in more than 90% of cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This was similar to that reported by Secker-Walker et al [16] and by Udayakmar et al [10] but lower to that reported by Williams et al [17] and Jarosova et al [18] who detected abnormal karyotypes in more than 90% of cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…TEL-AML1 is related with good prognosis and commonly found in ALL children aged between one to nine years. 17,18 This study found that ALL incidence in male were almost two times higher than female (64% vs 36%), similar with many previous studies in Myanmar, 17 Oman, 16 Argentina, 13 and Pakistan. 18 Pallor, fever, bone pain, bleeding, lymphadenopathy, hepatomegaly, and splenomegaly as main clinical symptoms in ALL were more prominent in poor responders.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…15 The age distribution was similar with previous study in Oman that found 13% childhood ALL patient were aged <1 year, 77% were aged between one to 10 years, and 11% were aged >10 years. 16 In this study, 81% of patient aged one to <10 years old had good response, while 75% of patient <1 year old and 78% patient aged ≥10 years old had poor response. Age is known as an important prognostic factor, with many studies showing that patient aged <1 and >9 years old had poor prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Thus, we suggest that in our case, with an early pro-T phenotype and the expression of CD34, the TCR γ has quite likely not yet been rearranged. The detected mutation of the NRAS gene and monosomy 18 only in the pro-T LBL component are in line with the well-known RAS gene family mutations in early T-cell-derived ALL [27] and with the reported cytogenetic anomalies in ALL [28]. Since the NRAS gene was not mutated in the IDCT, the G13D mutation might have represented a secondary genetic event in the pro-T LBL component, which corresponds with the putative role of RAS family member mutations as progression and not driver mutations [29].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%