1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2264(199903)24:3<222::aid-gcc7>3.0.co;2-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytogenetic polyclonality in hematologic malignancies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As seen in Tables 2 and 3, the frequencies of T21s and ⁄ or T21all varied significantly among the AML, MDS, MPN, and MDS ⁄ MPN cases, among the AML and MPN subtypes, and in relation to the age of the AML, MDS, and MPN patients, whereas there were no 1 The karyotypes of cases 1 and 7 have previously been reported (30,31). 2 Whole chromosome gains ⁄ losses not listed.…”
Section: Significant Frequency Differences Of Trisomy 21 In Myeloid Mmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…As seen in Tables 2 and 3, the frequencies of T21s and ⁄ or T21all varied significantly among the AML, MDS, MPN, and MDS ⁄ MPN cases, among the AML and MPN subtypes, and in relation to the age of the AML, MDS, and MPN patients, whereas there were no 1 The karyotypes of cases 1 and 7 have previously been reported (30,31). 2 Whole chromosome gains ⁄ losses not listed.…”
Section: Significant Frequency Differences Of Trisomy 21 In Myeloid Mmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The frequencies of cytogenetically independent clones found in an individual case are 4.3–6.5% in MDS and 1.1–3.7% in AML [ 1 , 11 ]. In most reported cases with cytogenetically unrelated clones in hematological malignancy, two clones were detected in one sample simultaneously by G-band analysis either in the initial disease [ 1 3 ] or relapsed disease [ 3 ] or in secondary MDS or AML [ 4 ]. Raimondi et al reported the appearance of an unrelated clone as relapsed leukemia 6–35 months after remission of the initial disease [ 5 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, this calculation is based on the method of Heim and Mitelman, 5 which was also used by developing the NCCSS. 4 The main problem of this approach is the fact that the number of abnormalities is calculated based on the most promi- 13 where four of the five patients with UC showed a combination of del(5q) and + 8.…”
Section: Prognostic Classification Of Unrelated Clonesmentioning
confidence: 99%