1964
DOI: 10.2307/1539349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytogenetic Effects of Chemosterilants in Mosquitoes. Ii. Mechanism of Apholate-Induced Changes in Fecundity and Fertility of Aedes Aegypti (L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(18 reference statements)
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with the earlier works of Darlington (1942), Evans (1962) in Drosophila, Rai (1964) in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes and Lakshmikumari (1995) in B.mori. According to Sturelid (1971) most of the physiological chromosomal aberrations appear due to the damage caused during replication of DNA by alkylation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This is in agreement with the earlier works of Darlington (1942), Evans (1962) in Drosophila, Rai (1964) in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes and Lakshmikumari (1995) in B.mori. According to Sturelid (1971) most of the physiological chromosomal aberrations appear due to the damage caused during replication of DNA by alkylation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In spermatheca, no effect is seen in treated insects, which is in accordance to Rai (1964) who reported similar observation in A. aegypti.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The occurrence of laggards, stickiness, acentric and dicentric bridges and the formation of ring chromosomes in anaphase of the present study have also been recorded by Rai (1964), Tadano and Kitzmiller (1969) and Grover et al (1973) using other chemicals. However, the triploar spindle formation, which looked like a triploid cell, and the broken bridges seen during anaphase of Culex p. fatigans have not been recorded so far by any of the workers using other chemicals.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…These chromosomes are designated as pairs 1, II and III based on their length following the convention set by Rai (1963).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%