2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10265-006-0041-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytogenetic characterization of Lippia alba and Lantana camara (Verbenaceae) from Brazil

Abstract: The aim of this work was to determine the cytogenetic characteristics of Brazilian Lippia alba (Mill) N. E. Brown and Lantana camara Plum. that could be useful for future characterization of these genera. Our analyses revealed that Li. alba has 2n=30 chromosomes consisting of ten metacentric and five submetacentric pairs, while La. camara has 44 metacentric chromosomes. The large blocks of heterochromatin seen in both species suggest an apomorphic condition. Six 45S rDNA sites were detected in both species by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, using the Giemsa staining technique, it was possible to observe that the majority of the metaphases presented only one or two visible pairs of satellite chromosomes. A previous report showed secondary constrictions only in two pairs of chromosomes, but in the same study, the authors observed six sites for the 45S rDNA probes (Brandão et al 2007). The secondary constrictions are formed in active sites with 45S rDNA (NORs) and sites with restricted NOR activation can, but don't have to, form secondary constrictions, thus hindering the real determination of their number and position through conventional techniques (Carvalho & Guerra 2002;Panzara et al 1996;Marcon et al 2005).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, using the Giemsa staining technique, it was possible to observe that the majority of the metaphases presented only one or two visible pairs of satellite chromosomes. A previous report showed secondary constrictions only in two pairs of chromosomes, but in the same study, the authors observed six sites for the 45S rDNA probes (Brandão et al 2007). The secondary constrictions are formed in active sites with 45S rDNA (NORs) and sites with restricted NOR activation can, but don't have to, form secondary constrictions, thus hindering the real determination of their number and position through conventional techniques (Carvalho & Guerra 2002;Panzara et al 1996;Marcon et al 2005).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Heterochromatin pattern of five different accessions of Lippia alba. ST = short arm telomere; C = centromeric region; LT = large arm telomere; + = DAPI and C coincidentes bands; * = only DAPI positive bands; = CMA 3 positive band and negative silver nitrate impregnation (AgNOR-); = CMA 3 positive band and positive silver nitrate impregnation (AgNOR+) two (Brandão et al 2007). Furthermore, we always observed a maximum number of four nucleoli (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The chromosome number described for the genus vary from n = 10 for L. rubella (Viccini et al 2006) to n = 30 for L. turbinata and L. fissicalyx (Pastoriza and Andrada 2006). Studies with somatic chromosomes were done only for L. turbinata, L. fissicalyx (Pastoriza and Andrada 2006) and Lippia alba (Brandão et al 2007, Sousa et al 2009, Pierre et al 2011). For L. alba, the most studied species, the karyological studies reveal the centromer position, number of secondary constrictions, heterochromatin distribution and the map of rDNA sites (45S and 5S) by FISH (Brandão et al 2007, Sousa et al 2009.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In H. umbellata, there are great blocks of heterochromatin revealed by C-banding technique, mainly around the centromere. This characteristic has been described for a great number of species but has not been reported earlier for Malpighiaceae (Brandão et al 2007, Sousa et al 2009). The heterochromatin is considered one of the most important factors in the evolution process (Edelman and Lin 1995) once it can interfere in many other mechanisms such as DNA replication, chromosomal structure, gene expression and the cell cycle (Redi et al 2001, Stace 2000.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%