2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0344-0338(04)80586-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytogenetic and morphologic typing of papillary renal cell carcinomas: evidence for a cytogenetic evolution of type 2 from type 1 tumors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
68
2
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
68
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The SNP array call rates obtained with the renal tumor samples are well within those accepted as adequate for copy number analysis in paraffin-embedded tissue with this technology (70-90% call rates), 19,29 and for reliable LOH analysis. 25 Furthermore, copy number aberrations and LOH detected by the SNP arrays were in agreement with the genetic abnormalities described in the literature for the different types of renal 6,30 This highlights the necessity of expanding the study to more renal cell tumors with whole genome analysis to define the frequency of this pattern in the papillary type 2 carcinoma group. It is important to note that the detection of copy number aberrations in tumors can be complicated by the presence of normal tissue (normal contamination), which can lead to false negatives.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The SNP array call rates obtained with the renal tumor samples are well within those accepted as adequate for copy number analysis in paraffin-embedded tissue with this technology (70-90% call rates), 19,29 and for reliable LOH analysis. 25 Furthermore, copy number aberrations and LOH detected by the SNP arrays were in agreement with the genetic abnormalities described in the literature for the different types of renal 6,30 This highlights the necessity of expanding the study to more renal cell tumors with whole genome analysis to define the frequency of this pattern in the papillary type 2 carcinoma group. It is important to note that the detection of copy number aberrations in tumors can be complicated by the presence of normal tissue (normal contamination), which can lead to false negatives.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Among other histotypes various gains and losses of DNA sequence copy number have been found when comparing primary clear cell or papillary renal cell carcinomas and metastatic lesions. [39][40][41][42][43][44] The histochemical and immunohistochemical analyses showed results as expected, regarding the epithelial component. 23,45,46 Parvalbumin and CK7 showed immunoexpression in the chromophobic cells whereas vimentin was absent; Hale's colloidal iron stain was diffusely positive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…These chromosomal abnormalities occur early in the evolution of papillary renal cell neoplasia and are often associated with further gains of chromosomes 12, 16 and 20. 17,[23][24][25][26][27][28][34][35][36] The typical gains of chromosome 7 and 17 and loss of Y in papillary renal cell carcinomas have been observed in several FISH-based studies, and FISH analyses with centromeric probes for chromosomes 7, 17 and Y have been previously proposed to have a potential role in the differential diagnosis of papillary renal cell tumors with metanephric adenomas. 25,27,32,35,37 Furthermore, recent studies performed with multicolor FISH confirmed the typical chromosomal abnormalities described in papillary renal cell carcinomas and interphase FISH may be considered as a sensitive and specific technique for a rapid and accurate identification of distinctive genetic abnormalities, that are potentially useful in the distinction of the different histotypes of renal cell carcinomas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%