2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2008.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytogenetic and molecular responses to standard-dose imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia are correlated with Sokal risk scores and duration of therapy but not trough imatinib plasma levels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
61
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
8
61
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It suggests that taking imatinib as soon as possible helps to achieve CMR. Our data agree with the conclusion that imatinib C mins are not correlated with molecular response [12] . An odd result was that the mean imatinib C mins in our patients were a littler higher in the no-CMR group than in the CMR group (P=0.237).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It suggests that taking imatinib as soon as possible helps to achieve CMR. Our data agree with the conclusion that imatinib C mins are not correlated with molecular response [12] . An odd result was that the mean imatinib C mins in our patients were a littler higher in the no-CMR group than in the CMR group (P=0.237).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Singh et al [11] also reported that the mean C mins of imatinib responders were significantly higher than those of non-responders. However, it was also reported that there was no correlation between mean C mins and CCyR or MMR [12] . The pharmacokinetics of imatinib has been extensively studied in Caucasian CML patients, and very recently Sakai et al [13] found that a lower dose of imatinib could maintain enough imatinib C mins and provided excellent results for the treatment of CML in a Japanese registry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Maintaining trough plasma IM levels at or above the mean population concentration of approximately 1000 ng/ mL may be important for achieving improved CCyR and MMR rates [16,17]. However, Forrest et al [18] reported no correlation between mean plasma trough IM levels and CCyR at 1 year (CCyR ¼ 1010 ng/mL vs. noCCyR ¼ 1175 ng/mL, p ¼ 0.29) or MMR (MMR ¼ 1067 ng/mL vs. no-MMR ¼ 1063 ng/mL, p ¼ 0.74) after a median of 1298 days of IM therapy. However, they suggested that further prospective studies were needed to establish the utility of trough plasma IM level monitoring in order to determine the most appropriate timing of the test, because their study may have been limited by patient numbers (n ¼ 78) and heterogeneous sampling times [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a recent single institution study failed to identify a difference in trough imatinib concentrations in those patients obtaining and those failing to obtain a CCyR or an MMR. 71 As no prospective data exist on the impact of dose intensification in those failing to obtain an optimal imatinib plasma level, the importance of drug-level monitoring will require further validation.…”
Section: Drug Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%