2001
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.1304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytogenetic and molecular characterization of two isodicentric Y chromosomes

Abstract: We report the results of detailed molecular-cytogenetic studies of two isodicentric Y [idic(Y)] chromosomes identified in patients with complex mosaic karyotypes. We used fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to determine the structure and genetic content of the abnormal chromosomes. In the first patient, classical cytogenetics and FISH analysis with Y chromosome-specific probes showed in peripheral blood lymphocytes a karyotype with 4 cell lines: 45,X[128]/46,X,+idic(Y)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(19 reference statements)
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the idic(Y)(q11.23) cell line is more common and monocentric Y chromosomes are reported to be more stable than dicentric ones (Haaf and Schmid, 1990), 'initial' chromosome aberration is probably idic(Y)(q11.23), whereas i(Y)(p10) seems to be produced through the rearrangement of idic(Y)(q11.23). Taking into account previous reports (Haaf and Schmid, 1990;Stankiewicz et al, 2001;Codina-Pascual et al, 2004;DesGroseilliers et al, 2006;Liehr et al, 2007), one can suggest that instability of idic(Y)(q11.23) is the main reason for its loss and gain. Together this is evidence for post-zygotic origin of all cell lines apart from idic(Y)(q11.23) and suggests that the index case represents an example of dynamic mosaicism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Since the idic(Y)(q11.23) cell line is more common and monocentric Y chromosomes are reported to be more stable than dicentric ones (Haaf and Schmid, 1990), 'initial' chromosome aberration is probably idic(Y)(q11.23), whereas i(Y)(p10) seems to be produced through the rearrangement of idic(Y)(q11.23). Taking into account previous reports (Haaf and Schmid, 1990;Stankiewicz et al, 2001;Codina-Pascual et al, 2004;DesGroseilliers et al, 2006;Liehr et al, 2007), one can suggest that instability of idic(Y)(q11.23) is the main reason for its loss and gain. Together this is evidence for post-zygotic origin of all cell lines apart from idic(Y)(q11.23) and suggests that the index case represents an example of dynamic mosaicism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Likewise, cases exhibiting further rearrangements of an isodicentric Y chromosome are uncommon (DesGroseilliers et al, 2006). There is a report of a boy with i(Y)(p10) and idic(Yq11.23) suggesting related karyotypes produce the male phenotype, but 45,X cells were not observed in that case (Stankiewicz et al, 2001). Tissue-specific distribution proposed as a mechanism of sex determination seems to be the closest explanation of phenotype in the index case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations