1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-4608(97)00224-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytogenetic Analysis of 39 Prostate Carcinomas and Evaluation of Short Term Tissue Culture Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The technical aspects of these analyses are not perfected, and the field looks optimistically at new technologies as they are developed to help answer questions and provide new clues to the chromosomal basis of this disease. Cell culturing methods and in vitro conditions clearly are not yet ideal to grow prostate tumor cells, and several groups have shown that variations in specific components of growth medium and methods used appear to improve the outgrowth of the correct cells [10,11,15,72].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The technical aspects of these analyses are not perfected, and the field looks optimistically at new technologies as they are developed to help answer questions and provide new clues to the chromosomal basis of this disease. Cell culturing methods and in vitro conditions clearly are not yet ideal to grow prostate tumor cells, and several groups have shown that variations in specific components of growth medium and methods used appear to improve the outgrowth of the correct cells [10,11,15,72].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is apparent from that summary that there is clearly clustering of ''activity'' at certain chromosomal sites. Genetic instability, showing rearrangements, gains, and losses at the same re- [8,10,11,. Small circles represent sites at which any structural abnormalities were reported in 2-10 different tumors; large circles represent sites at which any structural abnormalities were reported in >10 different tumors.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, primary cultures derived from adenocarcinomas are often diploid, especially when analyzed by standard karyotyping methods [Micale et al, 1992;Konig et al, 1993a;Ketter et al, 1996]. However, clonal chromosomal aberrations are found in a subset of primary cultures of cancer cells [Brothman et al, 1990[Brothman et al, , 1991Limon et al, 1990;Arps et al, 1993;Jones et al, 1994;Webb et al, 1996;Chopra et al, 1997;Konig et al, 1998]. When sensitive methods such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are employed, up to 80% of primary cultures derived from cancers have been reported to have clonal abnormalities [Brothman et al, 1992;Szucs et al, 1994].…”
Section: Chromosomal Aberrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the molecular pathogenesis of the disease is largely unknown, it has been suggested to involve a series of genetic alterations affecting both tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes (Sandberg, 1992;Isaacs, 1995;Kallioniemi and Visakorpi, 1996). Identification of structural chromosome abnormalities in prostate cancer has traditionally relied on karyotyping by banding techniques (Sandberg, 1992;Konig et al, 1998;Brothman et al, 1999). Numerical and structural alterations of several different chromosomes have been found without preferential involvement of any single chromosome.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%