Abstract:Metabolic activation of the dual-tyrosine kinase inhibitor lapatinib by cytochromes CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 has been implicated in lapatinibinduced idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity; however, the relative enzyme contributions have not been established. The objective of this study was to examine the roles of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 in lapatinib bioactivation leading to a reactive, potentially toxic quinoneimine. Reaction phenotyping experiments were performed using individual human recombinant P450 enzymes and P450-selective ch… Show more
“…Therefore, depending on the enzyme (CYP3A4 vs CYP3A5) and its predominantly catalyzed biotransformation pathways ( O ‐dealkylation vs N ‐oxidation) leading to different RM (nitroso vs p ‐quinone‐imine metabolite), lapatinib can cause quasi‐irreversible or irreversible CYP inactivation . CYP3A4 preferentially catalyzes lapatinib N ‐oxidation, while CYP3A5 preferentially catalyzes lapatinib O ‐dealkylation, which is consistent with the results of a docking study of lapatinib into CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 . A phenylalanine residue in CYP3A4 is involved in a π‐stacking interaction with the chlorophenyl ring, orienting lapatinib side chain toward the heme.…”
Section: Tki and Cyp Enzymes: Evidence Of Tdisupporting
confidence: 86%
“…GSH and methoxylamine adducts have been evidenced, involving RM in CYP inhibition . CYP3A inactivation mechanisms have been extensively studied . For Teng et al, the formation of a p ‐quinone‐imine 32 that covalently modifies the CYP3A4 apoprotein and/or heme is considered to be the most likely mechanism to explain CYP3A4 MBI (Figure ).…”
Section: Tki and Cyp Enzymes: Evidence Of Tdimentioning
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are small heterocyclic molecules targeting transmembrane and cytoplasmic tyrosine kinases that have met with considerable success in clinical oncology. TKI are associated with toxicities including liver injury that may be serious and even life‐threatening. Many of them require warnings in drug labeling against liver injury, and five of them have Black Box Warning (BBW) labels. Although drug‐induced liver injury is a matter of clinical and industrial concern, little is known about the underlying mechanisms that likely involve reactive metabolites (RM). RM are electrophiles or radicals originating from the metabolic activation of particular functional groups, known as structural alerts or toxicophores. RM are able to covalently bind to proteins and macromolecules, causing cellular damage and even cell death. If the adducted protein is the enzyme involved in RM formation, time‐dependent inhibition of the enzyme—also called mechanism‐based inhibition (MBI) or inactivation—can occur and lead to pharmacokinetic drug‐drug interactions. To mitigate RM liabilities, common practice in drug development includes avoiding structural alerts and assessing RM formation via RM trapping screens with soft and hard nucleophiles (glutathione, potassium cyanide, and methoxylamine) in liver microsomes. RM‐positive derivatives are further optimized to afford drug candidates with blocked or minimized bioactivation potential. However, different structural alerts are still commonly used scaffolds in drug design, including in TKI structures. This review focuses on the current state of knowledge of the relations among TKI structures, bioactivation pathways, RM characterization, and hepatotoxicity and cytochrome P450 MBI in vitro.
“…Therefore, depending on the enzyme (CYP3A4 vs CYP3A5) and its predominantly catalyzed biotransformation pathways ( O ‐dealkylation vs N ‐oxidation) leading to different RM (nitroso vs p ‐quinone‐imine metabolite), lapatinib can cause quasi‐irreversible or irreversible CYP inactivation . CYP3A4 preferentially catalyzes lapatinib N ‐oxidation, while CYP3A5 preferentially catalyzes lapatinib O ‐dealkylation, which is consistent with the results of a docking study of lapatinib into CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 . A phenylalanine residue in CYP3A4 is involved in a π‐stacking interaction with the chlorophenyl ring, orienting lapatinib side chain toward the heme.…”
Section: Tki and Cyp Enzymes: Evidence Of Tdisupporting
confidence: 86%
“…GSH and methoxylamine adducts have been evidenced, involving RM in CYP inhibition . CYP3A inactivation mechanisms have been extensively studied . For Teng et al, the formation of a p ‐quinone‐imine 32 that covalently modifies the CYP3A4 apoprotein and/or heme is considered to be the most likely mechanism to explain CYP3A4 MBI (Figure ).…”
Section: Tki and Cyp Enzymes: Evidence Of Tdimentioning
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are small heterocyclic molecules targeting transmembrane and cytoplasmic tyrosine kinases that have met with considerable success in clinical oncology. TKI are associated with toxicities including liver injury that may be serious and even life‐threatening. Many of them require warnings in drug labeling against liver injury, and five of them have Black Box Warning (BBW) labels. Although drug‐induced liver injury is a matter of clinical and industrial concern, little is known about the underlying mechanisms that likely involve reactive metabolites (RM). RM are electrophiles or radicals originating from the metabolic activation of particular functional groups, known as structural alerts or toxicophores. RM are able to covalently bind to proteins and macromolecules, causing cellular damage and even cell death. If the adducted protein is the enzyme involved in RM formation, time‐dependent inhibition of the enzyme—also called mechanism‐based inhibition (MBI) or inactivation—can occur and lead to pharmacokinetic drug‐drug interactions. To mitigate RM liabilities, common practice in drug development includes avoiding structural alerts and assessing RM formation via RM trapping screens with soft and hard nucleophiles (glutathione, potassium cyanide, and methoxylamine) in liver microsomes. RM‐positive derivatives are further optimized to afford drug candidates with blocked or minimized bioactivation potential. However, different structural alerts are still commonly used scaffolds in drug design, including in TKI structures. This review focuses on the current state of knowledge of the relations among TKI structures, bioactivation pathways, RM characterization, and hepatotoxicity and cytochrome P450 MBI in vitro.
“…Recombinantly expressed P450 enzymes and human liver microsomal preparations used in this study were similar to those described by Towles et al 18 Briefly, Supersomes (baculovirus-infected insect cell microsomes) containing cDNA-expressed human P450 1A1, 1A2, 1B1, 2B6, 2C8, 2C9*1, 2C19, 2D6*1, 2E1, 2J2, 3A4, and 3A5 coexpressed with P450 reductase and cytochrome b 5 , except P450 1A2 and 2D6*1 (expressed without cytochrome b 5 ), were purchased from Corning Discovery Labware (Woburn, MA). Pooled (150-Donor Ultra Pooled, mixed gender) and single-donor human liver microsomes (Lots HH741 and HH581) were purchased from Corning Discovery Labware.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…System A consisted of a Thermo Accela ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) system equipped with a Thermo PAL autoinjector and a column oven coupled to a Thermo TSQ Quantum Triple Quadrupole mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), as described previously. 18 Analyte separation was achieved using a Kinetex C18 or EVO C18 octadecylsilane column (2.6 μ m, 50 mm × 2.1 mm, 100 Å) (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA) with a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min and column oven temperature 30 °C. Mobile phases were (A) 0.1% formic acid in LC/MS-grade water and (B) 0.1% formic acid in LC/MS-grade acetonitrile (all v/v).…”
Sunitinib is a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor associated with idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity. The mechanisms of this toxicity are unknown. We hypothesized that sunitinib undergoes metabolic activation to form chemically reactive, potentially toxic metabolites which may contribute to development of sunitinib-induced hepatotoxicity. The purpose of this study was to define the role of cytochrome P450 (P450) enzymes in sunitinib bioactivation. Metabolic incubations were performed using individual recombinant P450s, human liver microsomal fractions, and P450-selective chemical inhibitors. Glutathione (GSH) and dansylated GSH were used as trapping agents to detect reactive metabolite formation. Sunitinib metabolites were analyzed by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. A putative quinoneimine–GSH conjugate (M5) of sunitinib was detected from trapping studies with GSH and dansyl–GSH in human liver microsomal incubations, and M5 was formed in an NADPH-dependent manner. Recombinant P450 1A2 generated the highest levels of defluorinated sunitinib (M3) and M5, with less formation by P450 3A4 and 2D6. P450 3A4 was the major enzyme forming the primary active metabolite N-desethylsunitinib (M1). In human liver microsomal incubations, P450 3A inhibitor ketoconazole reduced formation of M1 by 88%, while P450 1A2 inhibitor furafylline decreased generation of M5 by 62% compared to control levels. P450 2D6 and P450 3A inhibition also decreased M5 by 54 and 52%, respectively, compared to control. In kinetic assays, recombinant P450 1A2 showed greater efficiency for generation of M3 and M5 compared to that of P450 3A4 and 2D6. Moreover, M5 formation was 2.7-fold more efficient in human liver microsomal preparations from an individual donor with high P450 1A2 activity compared to a donor with low P450 1A2 activity. Collectively, these data suggest that P450 1A2 and 3A4 contribute to oxidative defluorination of sunitinib to generate a reactive, potentially toxic quinoneimine. Factors that alter P450 1A2 and 3A activity may affect patient risk for sunitinib toxicity.
“…These results suggest that flucloxacillin has a unique binding mode to the active site to CYP3A4, explaining the relatively weak inhibition by 1 μM ketaconazole and the unexpectedly strong inhibition by sulfaphenazole. A similar situation has been described recently in a study where sulfaphenazole significantly inhibited bioactivation of hydroxylapatinib by HLM, although recombinant CYP2C9 showed only very low activity (Towles et al ., ). Therefore, the CYP3A family in rare occurrences can be inhibited by sulfaphenazole in a substrate‐dependent manner.…”
Background and PurposeThe aim of this study was to characterize the human cytochrome P450s (CYPs) involved in oxidative bioactivation of flucloxacillin to 5‐hydroxymethyl flucloxacillin, a metabolite with high cytotoxicity towards biliary epithelial cells.Experimental ApproachThe CYPs involved in hydroxylation of flucloxacillin were characterized using recombinant human CYPs, pooled liver microsomes in the presence of CYP‐specific inhibitors and by correlation analysis using a panel of liver microsomes from 16 donors.Key ResultsRecombinant CYPs showing the highest specific activity were CYP3A4, CYP3A7 and to lower extent CYP2C9 and CTP2C8. Michaelis–Menten enzyme kinetics were determined for pooled human liver microsomes, recombinant CYP3A4, CYP3A7 and CYP2C9. Surprisingly, sulfaphenazole appeared to be a potent inhibitor of 5′‐hydroxylation of flucloxacillin by both recombinant CYP3A4 and CYP3A7.Conclusions and ImplicationsThe combined results show that the 5′‐hydroxylation of flucloxacillin is primarily catalysed by CYP3A4, CYP3A7 and CYP2C9. The large variability of the hepatic expression of these enzymes could affect the formation of 5′‐hydroxymethyl flucloxacillin, which may determine the differences in susceptibility to flucloxacillin‐induced liver injury. Additionally, the strong inhibition in CYP3A‐catalysed flucloxacillin metabolism by sulfaphenazole suggests that unanticipated drug–drug interactions could occur with coadministered drugs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.