1978
DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(78)80759-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytochrome bc1 and cytochrome oxidase can bind to the same surface domain of the cytochrome c molecule

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

1980
1980
1984
1984

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, one may ask what features of this mechanism are common to the smaller and larger cytochromes c of classes S and L. It may be, in light of the fact that no conformational change has been observed in molecules of these classes, that they function by a different mechanism (10). SUMMARY By using a three-point superposition of the oxidized and reduced forms of cytochrome c, motivated by chemical evidence (5)(6)(7) and by the observed (9) fit between the cytochrome c and cytochrome c peroxidase crystal structures, we have shown that the observed structure changes in cytochrome c upon oxidation correspond in detail to the binding mode for redox suggested by both chemical modification studies and the graphical docking experiments. We suggest that the observed large motion of lysine-27 upon oxidation leads to a change in binding affinity, which provides a dissociation signal to the cytochrome c-redox partner complex.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, one may ask what features of this mechanism are common to the smaller and larger cytochromes c of classes S and L. It may be, in light of the fact that no conformational change has been observed in molecules of these classes, that they function by a different mechanism (10). SUMMARY By using a three-point superposition of the oxidized and reduced forms of cytochrome c, motivated by chemical evidence (5)(6)(7) and by the observed (9) fit between the cytochrome c and cytochrome c peroxidase crystal structures, we have shown that the observed structure changes in cytochrome c upon oxidation correspond in detail to the binding mode for redox suggested by both chemical modification studies and the graphical docking experiments. We suggest that the observed large motion of lysine-27 upon oxidation leads to a change in binding affinity, which provides a dissociation signal to the cytochrome c-redox partner complex.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4] Since the position of T is fixed, we can determine that of t by determining the vector r1 and the angle 4 between R12 and the x-axis. It is readily found that r2 = X12 + A2, r2 = (x+1 + COS -x2)2 + (9 + 12 sin )2, [5] r2= [ …”
Section: Appendix: Three-point Superpositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They form reversible associations with their reductases and oxidases, that are mediated by complementary charge interactions [2,3]. Separation of cytochrome c oxidase by affinity chromatography on a cytochrome c column has been attempted [4] although the technique proved to be effective only with the Neurospora enzyme [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inability of a Sepharose 4B-cytochrome c column to easily and reproducibly separate cytochrome c oxidase may be due to the fact that the lysine residues, through which cytochrome c crosslinks to CNBractivated Sepharose 4B, are most probably the residues which are necessary for the cytochrome c oxidase and reductase binding [2,3,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not required for electron transfer [3], but it was reported to be indispensable for the formation of a complex between cytochrome c1 and cytochrome c [4,5]. In an active complex between these two cytochromes some amino acid sequences will realise a preferential contact.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%