“…Theories about calcium ion transport in the enamel organ depend to a large extent on differences that have been found between ruffleended and smooth-ended ameloblasts relative to: (1) "tightness" of apical/basal junctional complexes (simple permeability barriers) (Garant, 1972;Kallenbach, 1980;Takano and Crenshaw, 1980;Ozawa, 1980, 1984;Takano et al, 1983;Garant et al, 1984b;losephsen, 1984;Goldberg and Sasaki, 1985;McKee et al, 1986;Takano, 1995); (2) surface distribution of plasma-membrane-associated Ca2+,Mg2+-ATPases (calcium pumps) (Crenshaw and Takano, 1982;Takano et al, 1986;Sasaki et al, 1987a;Sasaki and Garant, 1987;Salama et al, 1989a;Eisenmann et al, 1990Eisenmann et al, , 1992Borke et al, 1993;Takano, 1995;Zaki et al, 1996); (3) presence/absence and distribution of various high-and low-affinity calcium-binding proteins and lipids in the plasma membranes and cytoplasm (calcium sponges) (Reith, 1983;Bawden, 1989;Berdal etal., 1991a,b;Takano, 1992Takano, , 1995Davideau et al, 1993;Hotton et al, 1995;Hubbard, 1995Hubbard, , 1996; and (4) the existence of low calcium uptake areas in enamel at short intervals after the injection of 45Ca (apparent calcium barriers) Crenshaw and Takano, 1982;Takano et al, 1982b;Reith et at., 1984;McKee and Warshawsky, 1986b;Kawamoto and Shimizu, 1987…”