2017
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2017-04-777722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytarabine dose in the consolidation treatment of AML: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
43
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous reports showed the assessment of intermediate-dose cytarabine monotherapy vs. intermediate-dose cytarabine combination treatment of standard dose chemotherapies did not present a significant difference with respect to RFS and OS. 24 Thus, no matter which standard dose chemotherapies were used, all patients can be considered as to be received with consolidation treatments equally. The only difference is the induction chemotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous reports showed the assessment of intermediate-dose cytarabine monotherapy vs. intermediate-dose cytarabine combination treatment of standard dose chemotherapies did not present a significant difference with respect to RFS and OS. 24 Thus, no matter which standard dose chemotherapies were used, all patients can be considered as to be received with consolidation treatments equally. The only difference is the induction chemotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two meta-analyses have examined published data on HDAC vs. IDAC for AML consolidation therapy [ 77 , 78 ]. Interpretation was difficult for both meta-analyses as trial design and cytarabine doses varied considerably between the included studies over a period of 25 years.…”
Section: Bridging Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In AML, parameters influencing treatment decisions as well as outcome include both patient-specific characteristics and leukemia-specific aberrations. Among the former, patient´s age and comorbidities are important variables; among the latter, the type of leukemia, white blood cell count, and genetic aberrations significantly influence response to induction therapy, type of consolidation treatment, and survival [21][22][23]. An AML risk classification scheme based on cytogenetic abnormalities was proposed as early as in 1998 [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%