2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0041-1345(01)02756-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cystatin C: a marker of glomerular filtration rate in liver transplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, there was no significant difference in MELD and Child Pugh score between normal and impaired renal function group, probably because we enrolled advanced cirrhosis patients who already have decompensated cirrhosis with ascites. Our results were consistent with previous studies 13,15,45-47. However, evaluation of renal function using serum CysC levels has several limitations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In this study, there was no significant difference in MELD and Child Pugh score between normal and impaired renal function group, probably because we enrolled advanced cirrhosis patients who already have decompensated cirrhosis with ascites. Our results were consistent with previous studies 13,15,45-47. However, evaluation of renal function using serum CysC levels has several limitations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In that study, the overestimation of the Cr-based assessment was greater in patients with moderate renal dysfunction (GFR \ 60 mL/min). Several studies reported that CysC was more useful for the assessment of renal function in patients with cirrhosis [18][19][20]. Demirtas et al [10] showed correlation between CysC and 99mTc-DTPA clearance (r = -0.522, p = 0.006), and between Cr and 99mTc-DTPA (r = -0.373, p = 0.06).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several retrospective evaluations of S Cr -based eGFR equations among liver transplant recipients suggest that the MDRD equations were best able to estimate GFR in comparison to radionucleotide GFR assessment; however, the precision of all GFR equations was poor [32,33]. Other eGFR equations such as the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and cystatin C based eGFR, have been proposed; however, like the MDRD equations, they have not been validated in patients with liver disease [34-38]. Therefore, we encourage very cautious use of these derived equations for the determination of GFR as they have not been validated in patients with liver disease.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%