2005
DOI: 10.1177/0265691405056875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyprus at the Crossroads, 1959–63

Abstract: Cyprus became independent in 1960, after a fierce dispute between Britain, Greece and Turkey; but the island did not find a way towards normal political development. After 1960, the Cyprus Republic, and mainly its President, Archbishop Makarios, could follow either the long-term option of implementing the 1959 Zurich–London agreements and integrating with the West; or the short-term option of trying to acquire unlimited independence and following a non-aligned policy. From late 1962, as disagreements with the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3. For more on the history of the Cyprus problem, see (Castleberry 1964, Joseph 1999, Fisher 2001, Hatzivasileiou 2005. For a more Turkish Cypriot-focused works see Kaymak 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. For more on the history of the Cyprus problem, see (Castleberry 1964, Joseph 1999, Fisher 2001, Hatzivasileiou 2005. For a more Turkish Cypriot-focused works see Kaymak 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the specific needs of my research design, Turkey’s Cyprus policy in June 1964 is an appropriate negative case of homeland intervention because commitment problems were at play. From 4 January 1962, when Makarios made the first public reference to the possibility of revising Cyprus’ power-sharing constitution, his ability to credibly commit to moderate and fair policies was gradually eroded in the eyes of the Turkish-Cypriot leadership and the government of Turkey (Hatzivassiliou, 2005). In the two years preceding June 1964, Turkish and Turkish-Cypriot leaders experienced efforts to change the distribution of power to the disadvantage of the Turkish Cypriots and in favor of the Makarios government.…”
Section: A Comparative Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, Ankara’s involvement, combined with the increasing influence of partitionists in internal Turkish-Cypriot politics, blocked any departure from the demand that municipal councils be kept separate (see Markides, 2001: 71–127). The issue contributed to Makarios’ commitment problems at the time, because any weakening of separate administration on the municipal level was perceived as an unacceptable transfer of power that would strip the Turkish-Cypriots of all their political rights (Hatzivassiliou, 2005: 536; author’s interviews with Acarkan, 2011; and Kotak, 2011). In August 1962, Denktaş made this connection clear when he stated that separate municipalities were “indisputable indications of the rights of the Turks on this island.…”
Section: Turkey and Cyprus: How 1964 Was Different From 1974mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations