2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2021.116388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CYPlebrity: Machine learning models for the prediction of inhibitors of cytochrome P450 enzymes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A benchmark of different datasets used and models’ performances as reported in the literature is given in S5 Table . In order to directly compare the performance of our models with other recent ones, we show here the performance of our final models and two state-of-the arts models available at the web servers CYPlebrity [ 44 ] and ADMETlab [ 45 ] on our external validation test set of inhibitors and non-inhibitors (see Table 3 ). Overall, our models performed better than the others (Tables 3 and S5 ), and showed remarkably better sensitivity, which is critical to detect inhibitors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A benchmark of different datasets used and models’ performances as reported in the literature is given in S5 Table . In order to directly compare the performance of our models with other recent ones, we show here the performance of our final models and two state-of-the arts models available at the web servers CYPlebrity [ 44 ] and ADMETlab [ 45 ] on our external validation test set of inhibitors and non-inhibitors (see Table 3 ). Overall, our models performed better than the others (Tables 3 and S5 ), and showed remarkably better sensitivity, which is critical to detect inhibitors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate prediction of the CYP3A4 inhibitory activity is crucial in experiments. Previously reported models for CYP inhibitors prediction have primarily focused on binary classification, ,, distinguishing between compounds with and without inhibitory activity using a threshold such as IC 50 at 10 μM. In the actual drug discovery process, it is essential to predict the inhibitory intensity and confidence level to provide better guidance for drug design.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CYP2B6 inhibitor data sets were gained through the following three sources: (1) The ChEMBL bioactivity database (ChEMBL ID: 4729), 21 which contains information on enzyme inhibition, was mined. As reported in a previous study, 22 the compounds assigned by "standard type" "IC 50 " or "K i " and "standard unit" "nM" were retained and the rest were excluded. If "Standard Relation" was one of "<", "=", or "≤" and the "Standard Value" was less than 10,000, the entries were defined as active.…”
Section: Data Collection 211 Cyp2b6 Inhibitor Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CYP2B6 substrate and inhibitor data sets were compiled from three sources: the ChEMBL bioactivity database, the DrugBank database, and scientific literature. From the ChEMBL bioactivity database, according to the previously reported study, 22 we gathered the inhibitors/noninhibitors based on IC 50 and K i values, which allowed us to obtain 109 inhibitors and 148 noninhibitors. From the DrugBank database, we obtained the inhibitors or substrates depending on the "action" of the drugs, which led us to collect 50 inhibitors and 73 substrates.…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%