1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf00176834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cygnus X-1 revisited

Abstract: We review the X-and gamma-ray observations of Cygnus X-1 and their theoretical interpretations, with emphasis on new developments since the mid-1970's. The overall data base at present is most consistent with the inverse Compton model by hot thermal electrons of T e ~ 109 K, for the hard X-ray luminosity (10-200 keV). However, the origin of the soft X-rays (< 10 keV) in high states and gamma rays (> 200 keV) remain unsettled.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
83
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
2
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The soft (< 10 keV) X-ray luminosity of Cyg X-1 is ∼ 8.5 × 10 36 erg/s on average [5], while during the heao-3 γ 1 , γ 2 states it was even lower [10]. Taking into account that for hard X-ray photons the Comptonization efficiency in the hot plasma drops substantially [21] while the number of photons decreases as well, the obtained values, L soft ≈ 10 37 erg/s, match the data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The soft (< 10 keV) X-ray luminosity of Cyg X-1 is ∼ 8.5 × 10 36 erg/s on average [5], while during the heao-3 γ 1 , γ 2 states it was even lower [10]. Taking into account that for hard X-ray photons the Comptonization efficiency in the hot plasma drops substantially [21] while the number of photons decreases as well, the obtained values, L soft ≈ 10 37 erg/s, match the data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are occasional periods of 'high' state emission. Remarkable is c 1997 American Institute of Physics 1 the anticorrelation between the soft and hard X-ray components [5], which is clearly seen during transitions between the two states. Since its launch in 1991 cgro has observed Cyg X-1 several times.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Support for this suspicion is found on detailed analyses carried on radial velocity measurements as well as on recent analyses based on spectrum synthesis (Herrero et al 1995) both of which give a mass of about 10 M 0 , comfortably larger than the 3 M 0 upper limit of a neutron star mass. The luminosity is sub-Eddington, but greater than 0.01 L Edd (Liang and Nolan 1984). Cygnus X-1, being one of the most studied sources in the sky, especially in the hard X-rays, some of its properties (characteristic hard X-ray spectrum, episodic emergence of an ultra soft component, anticorrelated soft and hard X-ray transitions, chaotic variability down to milliseconds, persistent gamma-ray tail above an MeV, episodic gamma-ray bumps at a few hundred keV-MeV, persistent radio emission and radio flaring correlated with X-ray transitions and Low-Frequency Quasi Periodic Oscillations (QPO)) have been accepted as evidence for black hole candidacy (Liang 1998).…”
Section: Observational Aspects: a Brief Reviewmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…One of the most interesting sources is 1E 1740.7−2942, the brightest and hardest persistent X-ray source within a few degrees of the GC. Because of a similar hard X-ray spectrum and comparable luminosity to Cygnus X-1 (Liang & Nolan 1984), 1E 1740.7−2942 is classified as a black hole candidate. Because of the two-sided radio jets associated to the source, the object was dubbed the first "microquasar" (Mirabel et al 1992), an X-ray binary whose behavior mimics quasars on a much smaller scale.…”
Section: Scientific Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%