2019
DOI: 10.1186/s13638-019-1410-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyclostationarity-based DOA estimation algorithms for coherent signals in impulsive noise environments

Abstract: Estimating direction of arrival (DOA) is important in a variety of practical applications. Conventional cyclostationarity-based coherent DOA estimation algorithms are not robust to non-Gaussian α-stable impulsive noise. Additionally, fractional lower-order statistics (FLOS)-based algorithms are tolerant to impulsive noise; however, they experience performance degradation for coherent signals and interference. To overcome these drawbacks, two types of fractional lower-order cyclostationarity-based subspace DOA … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21 For estimating the cyclic spectra, smoothing frequencies or time smoothing algorithms can be used. 22 However, time-smoothing algorithms have higher efficiency and reliability compared with algorithms for frequency smoothing. 23 The time-smooth cyclic phase diagram can be used as follows to determine the cyclic continuum if the measurement time is as t:…”
Section: Cyclostationary Feature Extraction Using Fammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…21 For estimating the cyclic spectra, smoothing frequencies or time smoothing algorithms can be used. 22 However, time-smoothing algorithms have higher efficiency and reliability compared with algorithms for frequency smoothing. 23 The time-smooth cyclic phase diagram can be used as follows to determine the cyclic continuum if the measurement time is as t:…”
Section: Cyclostationary Feature Extraction Using Fammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The period for Ts is indicated by the complex demodulate of w(k) and x(n) by X(Ts) (n, v + α/2), while w(k) represents the data tapering window of T w = Np Ts seconds. FAM is derived from (22). The CS is determined for each portion in the small parts of both frequency planes (v, α).…”
Section: Cyclostationary Feature Extraction Using Fammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature [24][25][26], the FLOM-MUSIC algorithm based on the fractional lower-order moment (FLOM) was proposed. In the literature [27][28][29], a fractional lower-order cyclic MUSIC (FLOC-MUSIC) algorithm using a fractional lower-order cyclic covariance matrix was proposed. However, these FLOS-based algorithms require prior knowledge of the characteristic exponent of stable distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the algorithm in the literature [27][28][29][30][31], the algorithm in this paper does not require large sample sampling and loop iterations, so the computational complexity is low; 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the classical approach of cyclostationary-based techniques the assumption of Gaussian noise is taken under consideration [7,9,[22][23][24][25][26]. However, one can find the papers where the algorithms for the signals with non-Gaussian noise are proposed [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. We refer also to the recent paper, where the new definition of the cyclostationary non-Gaussian signal is given, see [27] for more details.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%