2010
DOI: 10.1097/tp.0b013e3181c42b95
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyclosporine Lowering With Everolimus or Mycophenolate to Preserve Renal Function in Heart Recipients: A Randomized Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2,6 -11 In an earlier randomized study we found a similar efficacy for cyclosporine lowering when administered in combination with either mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or everolimus, with evaluation done after 12 months. 15 In the current study we aimed to determine whether any differences could be observed at 3 years.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…2,6 -11 In an earlier randomized study we found a similar efficacy for cyclosporine lowering when administered in combination with either mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or everolimus, with evaluation done after 12 months. 15 In the current study we aimed to determine whether any differences could be observed at 3 years.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[10][11][12][13] In contrast, trials in maintenance patients have been restricted to patients who have already developed renal dysfunction. [14][15][16] The kidney-sparing effect of these various everolimus-based regimens has been mixed (Table 1). Of note, however, the only two trials to use measured GFR instead of eGFR or other secondary markers both found a significant advantage for everolimus.…”
Section: Preservation Of Renal Functionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…25 Studies in which everolimus is introduced more than 12 months after heart transplantation generally do not report CMV rates due to the very low rate of such lateonset cases. [14][15][16] Cardiac allograft vasculopathy CAV is a leading cause of death in heart transplant patients. 26 It has a complex etiology, with multiple risk factors 27 including CMV infection 28 and rejection.…”
Section: Cytomegalovirus Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EVRL was associated with twice as many pneumonias in the first year and 1.8 fold increases in risk of rejection after 2 years. Proteinuria was not reported.To complicate the picture, the small, randomized SHIRAKISS study, showed that late addition of MMF or EVRL while reducing CNI levels by 30% and 70% respectively, resulted in better renal function on MMF after 3 years [46,47]. This outcome was dependent on baseline proteinuria only with EVRL.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kidney function at the time of introduction of the drugs should be moderately decreased to see the most benefit and although patients with GFR below 30mL/ min can benefit many of the above studies showed that more patients with poor baseline GFR will progress despite PSI therapy due to advanced, irreversible CNI kidney toxicity [56]. The presence of baseline proteinuria is cause for concern as is the presence of diabetes and might negate any benefit of PSI use [34,37,46,47,54]. The use of ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers might mitigate the adverse effect of PSI induced proteinuria on worsening renal function but this is not based on large number of patients [34,37,57].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%