Comprehensive Polymer Science and Supplements 1989
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-096701-1.00138-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cyclopolymerization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When preliminarily evaluating these cyclopolymerizing monomers for use in dentistry, STANSBURY found a potential for developing high-conversion, low-shrinking monomers, A 30 to 40% reduction in shrinkage was observed upon homopolymerization of oxybismethacrylate monomers and oligomers compared with dimethacrylates commonly used in dentistry (125,126). The reduction in polymerization shrinkage was originally thought to result from a pre-orientation of the carbon-carbon double bonds to give a pseudo-cyclic conformation (127). According to STANSBDRY (125), a more likely explanation is the larger apparent free volume swept out by a cyclic structure in a constrained polymer, compared with that occupied by a more mobile, linear structure.…”
Section: Non-shrinking Monomersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When preliminarily evaluating these cyclopolymerizing monomers for use in dentistry, STANSBURY found a potential for developing high-conversion, low-shrinking monomers, A 30 to 40% reduction in shrinkage was observed upon homopolymerization of oxybismethacrylate monomers and oligomers compared with dimethacrylates commonly used in dentistry (125,126). The reduction in polymerization shrinkage was originally thought to result from a pre-orientation of the carbon-carbon double bonds to give a pseudo-cyclic conformation (127). According to STANSBDRY (125), a more likely explanation is the larger apparent free volume swept out by a cyclic structure in a constrained polymer, compared with that occupied by a more mobile, linear structure.…”
Section: Non-shrinking Monomersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important advantage of such counterion crosslinked vesicles is that the vesicular bilayer is only electrostatically bound to the crosslinked network and is therefore likely to maintain its fluid nature, unlike the case of most reported polymerized vesicles. One important difference between our counterion crosslinkable vesicles and those reported by Regen and coworkers31 is that our system is truly crosslinkable, whereas Regen's systems used diallyl ammonium counterions, which are known to undergo cyclopolymerization,32 possibly leading to the formation of linear rather than crosslinked polymers. Thus, our system might well represent a truer example of a vesicular assembly with a crosslinked polymeric net encasing it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Thus, the enhanced stability is gained without a significant loss of fluidity of the bilayer components. One potential drawback with the Regen systems is that the diallylammonium counterions are known to undergo cyclopolymerization to produce linear rather than crosslinked systems,32 and, hence, the extent of crosslinking in their vesicles, if any, might have been rather limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possibility of competing acid catalysed, carbocation mediated linear polymerization was considered to be unlikely because the linear polymerization of a difunctional monomer to such high molecular weights would be expected to yield a highly crosslinked, insoluble polymer. Consequently, carbocation mediated cyclopolymerization 5 was suspected. However, the NMR spectrum of poly (3) did not provide an unambiguous structural assignment for these polymer linkages.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%